Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
11-ORD-179
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Office of the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General …
Judy Ponder — Oldham County Engineer
Open Records Decision —
11-ORD-182
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Office of the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General …
Judy Ponder — Oldham County Planning & Development Services
Open Meetings Decision —
12-OMD-185
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Oldham County Board of Adjustments and Appeals violated the Open Meetings Act …
Judy Ponder — Oldham County Board of Adjustments and Appeals
Open Meetings Decision —
12-OMD-200
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Matt James, Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The questions presented in this appeal are whether the Oldham County Code Enforcement Board violated the Open Meetings Act by: 1) …
Judy Ponder — Oldham County Code Enforcement Board
Open Meetings Decision —
12-OMD-202
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Oldham County Board of Adjustments and Appeals violated the Open Meetings Act …
Judy Ponder — Oldham County Board of Adjustments and Appeals
Open Records Decision —
12-ORD-211
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Michelle D. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Oldham County Board of Adjustments and Appeals violated the Kentucky Open …
Judy Ponder — Oldham County Board of Adjustments and Appeals
Open Records Decision —
13-ORD-035
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Michelle D. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Oldham County Board of Adjustments and Appeals violated the Kentucky Open …
Judy Ponder — Oldham County Board of Adjustments and Appeals
Open Meetings Decision —
13-OMD-113
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The Attorney General having received an appeal from Judy Ponder under the Open Meetings Act, and it appearing that the appeal is …
Judy Ponder — Oldham County Board of Adjustments and Appeals
Open Meetings Decision —
14-OMD-063
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Oldham County Board of Adjustments and Appeals violated the Open Meetings Act …
Judy Ponder — Oldham County Board of Adjustments and Appeals
Open Meetings Decision —
14-OMD-216
Request By: Ms. Judy Ponder Mr. Kevin Jeffries John K. Carter, Esq. Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Oldham …
Judy Ponder — Oldham County Planning Commission
Open Records Decision —
14-ORD-232
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether Oldham County Planning and Development Services ("OCPDS") violated the Open Records …
Judy Ponder — Oldham County Planning and Development Services
23-ORD-301
23-ORD-301 November 6, 2023 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown Summary: The City of Georgetown (“the City”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of notes under KRS 61.878(1)(i). Open Records Decision On …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown
24-ORD-010
24-ORD-010 January 17, 2024 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown Summary: Under 40 KAR 1:030 § 4, the Attorney General may not reconsider a decision rendered under the Open Records Act (“the Act”). The Office will not reconsider 23-ORD-301, in which …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown
Open Meetings Decision —
24-OMD-218
24-OMD-218 October 4, 2024 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown and Scott County Fiscal Court Summary: The Office lacks jurisdiction to consider a complaint alleging the City of Georgetown (“the City”) and the Scott County Fiscal Court (“the Fiscal …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown and Scott County Fiscal Court
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.