Search AG Opinions & Decisions
24-ORD-010
24-ORD-010 January 17, 2024 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown Summary: Under 40 KAR 1:030 § 4, the Attorney General may not reconsider a decision rendered under the Open Records Act (“the Act”). The Office will not reconsider 23-ORD-301, in which …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-124
24-ORD-124 May 16, 2024 In re: Krystal Justice/Hodgenville Police Department Summary: The Office is unable to find that the Hodgenville Police Department (the “Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is unable to …
Krystal Justice — Hodgenville Police Department
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-123
24-ORD-123 May 16, 2024 In re: Krystal Justice/City of Hodgenville Summary: The Office is unable to find that the City of Hodgenville (the “City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is unable to resolve the factual dispute …
Krystal Justice — City of Hodgenville
Open Meetings Decision —
24-OMD-218
24-OMD-218 October 4, 2024 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown and Scott County Fiscal Court Summary: The Office lacks jurisdiction to consider a complaint alleging the City of Georgetown (“the City”) and the Scott County Fiscal Court (“the Fiscal …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown and Scott County Fiscal Court
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.