Search AG Opinions & Decisions
23-ORD-301
23-ORD-301 November 6, 2023 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown Summary: The City of Georgetown (“the City”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of notes under KRS 61.878(1)(i). Open Records Decision On …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown
24-ORD-010
24-ORD-010 January 17, 2024 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown Summary: Under 40 KAR 1:030 § 4, the Attorney General may not reconsider a decision rendered under the Open Records Act (“the Act”). The Office will not reconsider 23-ORD-301, in which …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown
Open Meetings Decision —
24-OMD-218
24-OMD-218 October 4, 2024 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown and Scott County Fiscal Court Summary: The Office lacks jurisdiction to consider a complaint alleging the City of Georgetown (“the City”) and the Scott County Fiscal Court (“the Fiscal …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown and Scott County Fiscal Court
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-032
25-ORD-032 February 3, 2025 In re: Ryan J. Dischinger/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response within five business days of receiving …
Ryan J. Dischinger — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-086
25-ORD-086 March 31, 2025 In re: Ryan J. Dischinger/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it did not respond to …
Ryan J. Dischinger — Louisville Metro Government
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.