Search AG Opinions & Decisions
24-ORD-019
24-ORD-019 January 25, 2024 In re: Vivian Miles/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a timely response and failed to respond to a portion of a request. …
Vivian Miles — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-089
24-ORD-089 April 1, 2024 In re: Vivian Miles/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request as too imprecise under KRS …
Vivian Miles — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-137
24-ORD-137 June 12, 2024 In re: Makeda Charles/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records it does not …
Makeda Charles — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-136
24-ORD-136 June 12, 2024 In re: Makeda Charles/Jefferson Circuit Court Clerk Summary: The Open Records Act (“the Act”) does not apply to records of the Jefferson Circuit Court Clerk (“the Clerk”). Open Records Decision On May 7, 2024, Makeda …
Makeda Charles — Jefferson Circuit Court Clerk
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-135
24-ORD-135 June 12, 2024 In re: Makeda Charles/Louisville Regional Airport Authority Summary: The Louisville Regional Airport Authority (“the Authority”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it initially denied a request because it had …
Makeda Charles — Louisville Regional Airport Authority
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-146
24-ORD-146 June 18, 2024 In re: Makeda Charles/City of Louisville Summary: The City of Louisville (the “City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request made under the Act. Open Records Decision On April 19, …
Makeda Charles — City of Louisville
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-140
24-ORD-140 June 18, 2024 In re: Makeda Charles/Central State Hospital Summary: The Office cannot find that the Central State Hospital (“the Hospital”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is unable to resolve the factual …
Makeda Charles — Central State Hospital
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-138
24-ORD-138 June 18, 2024 In re: Makeda Charles/Spirit Airlines Summary: The Office cannot find that Spirit Airlines (the “Airline”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot find that it is a “public agency” subject to the …
Makeda Charles — Spirit Airlines
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-149
24-ORD-149 June 25, 2024 In re: Makeda Charles/Central State Hospital Summary: The Central State Hospital (“the Hospital”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records it does not possess. Open Records Decision …
Makeda Charles — Central State Hospital
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-156
24-ORD-156 July 2, 2024 In re: Makeda Charles/Federal Bureau of Investigation Summary: The Office cannot find that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the FBI is a federal agency not subject …
Makeda Charles — Federal Bureau of Investigation
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-155
24-ORD-155 July 2, 2024 In re: Makeda Charles/Jefferson County Attorney Summary: The Jefferson County Attorney (“the County Attorney”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when he withheld records pertaining to criminal litigation under …
Makeda Charles — Jefferson County Attorney
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-154
24-ORD-154 July 2, 2024 In re: Makeda Charles/Louisville-Jefferson County Department of Corrections Summary: The Louisville-Jefferson County Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it …
Makeda Charles — Louisville-Jefferson County Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-164
24-ORD-164 July 18, 2024 In re: Vivian Miles/Lexington Police Department Summary: The Lexington Police Department (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open Records …
Vivian Miles — Lexington Police Department
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-166
24-ORD-166 July 22, 2024 In re: Makeda Charles/The Courier-Journal Summary: The Office cannot find that the Courier-Journal (“the Newspaper”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot find that it is a “public agency” …
Makeda Charles — The Courier-Journal
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-169
24-ORD-169 July 30, 2024 In re: Vivian Miles/Lexington Police Department Summary: The Lexington Police Department (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it could not provide records that do not exist. Open Records …
Vivian Miles — Lexington Police Department
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-185
24-ORD-185 August 28, 2024 In re: Makeda Charles/Louisville Metro Department of Corrections Summary: The Louisville Metro Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for …
Makeda Charles — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-208
24-ORD-208 September 26, 2024 In re: Vivian Miles/Lexington Police Department Summary: The Lexington Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that …
Vivian Miles — Lexington Police Department
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-254
24-ORD-254 November 26, 2024 In re: Vivian Miles/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying access to requested records …
Vivian Miles — Kentucky State Police
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.