Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
08-ORD-088
Request By: Taquan Neblett, # 119028 Kimberly Potter-Blair Emily Dennis Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Michelle D. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision At issue in this appeal is whether the Department of …
Taquan Neblett — Department of Corrections, Division of Probation and Parole, District Nine
Open Records Decision —
11-ORD-098
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Office of the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General …
Taquan Neblett — Otter Creek Correctional Center
Open Records Decision —
12-ORD-186
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently …
Taquan Neblett — Clerk of the Court of Appeals
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-149
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On July 11, 2020, Taquan Neblett ("Appellant") requested from the Reformatory a copy of "the emergency meal menu." In a timely response, …
Taquan Neblett — Kentucky State Reformatory
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-021
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron Attorney General; Marc Manley Assistant Attorney General Summary: The Kentucky State Reformatory ("Reformatory") did not violate the Open Records Act ("the Act") when it denied an inmate's request for records that …
Taquan Neblett — Kentucky State Reformatory
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-051
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 16, 2022, inmate Taquan Neblett ("Appellant") allegedly submitted a request for an "[i]temized receipt of all co-pay …
Taquan Neblett — Kentucky State Reformatory
22-ORD-248
22-ORD-248 November 18, 2022 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it did …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-002
23-ORD-002 January 3, 2023 In re: Melanie Barker/ Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-020
23-ORD-020 January 31, 2023 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it did …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Service
23-ORD-068
23-ORD-068 March 27, 2023 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because it was not obligated to create a …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-109
23-ORD-109 May 15, 2023 In re: Taquan Neblett/Kentucky State Reformatory Summary: This Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Reformatory (the “Reformatory”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request it …
Taquan Neblett — Kentucky State Reformatory
23-ORD-225
23-ORD-225 August 21, 2023 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (the “Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond properly to a request to …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-214
24-ORD-214 October 3, 2024 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Record Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records it does not …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-041
25-ORD-041 February 13, 2025 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response to two …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-059
25-ORD-059 March 6, 2025 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response to a request to …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-123
25-ORD-123 May 14, 2025 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response to two requests to …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-121
25-ORD-121 May 14, 2025 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that it …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-133
25-ORD-133 May 22, 2025 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to explain how an exemption applied to …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.