Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
02-ORD-081
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; James M. Ringo, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The issue presented in this appeal is whether the City of Louisville Police Department's response to the open records …
Tommy L. Jones — City of Louisville Police Department
Open Records Decision —
02-ORD-141
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Jefferson County Corrections Department violated the Open …
Tommy L. Jones — Jefferson County Corrections Department
Open Records Decision —
02-ORD-201
Opinion Opinion By: A. B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being …
Tommy L. Jones — Jefferson Circuit Court Clerk
Open Records Decision —
02-ORD-219
Opinion Opinion By: A. B. Chandler III, Attorney General; James M. Ringo, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being …
Tommy L. Jones — Commonwealth's Attorney for the 30th Judicial Circuit
Open Records Decision —
03-ORD-133
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Louisville Metro Police Department violated the Open Records Act …
Tommy L. Jones — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
03-ORD-186
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; James M. Ringo, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Kentucky State Police (KSP) violated the Open Records Act in failing …
Tommy L. Jones — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
03-ORD-220
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Michelle D. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision At issue in this appeal is whether the Louisville Metro Police Department violated the Kentucky Open Records Act in …
Tommy L. Jones — Louisville Metro Police Department
22-ORD-248
22-ORD-248 November 18, 2022 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it did …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-002
23-ORD-002 January 3, 2023 In re: Melanie Barker/ Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-020
23-ORD-020 January 31, 2023 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it did …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Service
23-ORD-068
23-ORD-068 March 27, 2023 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because it was not obligated to create a …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-225
23-ORD-225 August 21, 2023 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (the “Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond properly to a request to …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-214
24-ORD-214 October 3, 2024 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Record Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records it does not …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-041
25-ORD-041 February 13, 2025 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response to two …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-059
25-ORD-059 March 6, 2025 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response to a request to …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-123
25-ORD-123 May 14, 2025 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response to two requests to …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-121
25-ORD-121 May 14, 2025 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that it …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.