Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-121
25-ORD-121 May 14, 2025 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that it …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-120
25-ORD-120 May 14, 2025 In re: Kurt Wallace/Office of the Attorney General Summary: The Office of the Attorney General (“the Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records it does not possess. Open Records …
Kurt Wallace — Office of the Attorney General
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-127
25-ORD-127 May 15, 2025 In re: Uriah Pasha/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (“the Center”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld pre-parole progress reports under KRS 61.878(1)(j). Open Records …
Uriah Pasha — Lee Adjustment Center
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-126
25-ORD-126 May 15, 2025 In re: Amanda Kirby/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot resolve the factual dispute between the …
Amanda Kirby — Kentucky State Police
Open Meetings Decision —
25-OMD-125
25-OMD-125 May 15, 2025 In re: Ricky Ladd/Graves County Board of Education Summary: The Graves County Board of Education (“Board”) did not violate the Open Meetings Act (“the Act”) when it discussed the potential purchase of real estate in closed …
Ricky Ladd — Graves County Board of Education
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-124
25-ORD-124 May 15, 2025 In re: Bobby Ellison/City of London Summary: The City of London (“the City”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide a copy of a record to a county resident prior to his inspection of the …
Bobby Ellison — City of London
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-128
25-ORD-128 May 16, 2025 In re: Channell Cole/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it …
Channell Cole — Louisville Metro Police Department
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.