12-ORD-155 is cited in the decision as a precedent where the Attorney General affirmed the Division of Probation and Parole's denial of an inmate's request for urinalysis test results while on parole. This previous decision is used to support the current decision to affirm the Interstate Compact Office's denial of Mr. Johnson's request for his parole officer's file, indicating that the reasoning and conclusions of 12-ORD-155 are adopted in full in the current case.
12-ORD-155 was Followed by 15-ORD-187
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.