Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General

In re: Michael Mobley/Department of Corrections

Summary : The Department of Corrections, Division of Probation and Parole ("Division"), did not violate the Open Records Act ("the Act") because it did not receive the request Appellant claimed he sent. Regardless, custody time credit records prepared by probation and parole officers are exempt from the Act under KRS 439.510.

Open Records Decision

On June 11, 2020, inmate Michael Mobley ("Appellant") requested a copy of "all jail time credit from 5/10/2018 until 1/13/2020." On the request form, Appellant identified "Fayette Co. Probation and Parole Authority" as the agency from which he sought records. However, there is no address on the request, and this Office is unable to determine where Appellant mailed the request. Appellant initiated this appeal after receiving no response. This Office issued a notice of appeal to the Department of Corrections ("Department") for a response.

In response to the appeal, the Department states that none of its divisions received Appellant's request, either at the central office in Frankfort or at the district office in Lexington. After a search, however, the Division located two responsive custody time credit records prepared by probation and parole officers. The Division asserts that those records are exempt from disclosure under KRS 439.510 and KRS 61.878(1)(l).

KRS 439.510 provides:

KRS 439.510 is incorporated into the Act under KRS 61.878(1)(l). This Office has consistently found that requests to inspect probation and parole records are properly denied under KRS 439.510. See, e.g. , 17-ORD-022; 05-ORD-265; 01-ORD-120. Because the Division never received Appellant's request, the Division did not violate the Act. Moreover, the records sought are expressly exempted from the Act.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General shall be notified of any action in circuit court, but shall not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceedings.

Daniel Cameron

Attorney General

/s/ James M. Herrick

James M. Herrick

Assistant Attorney General

LLM Summary
The decision concludes that the Department of Corrections did not violate the Open Records Act as it did not receive the request from the appellant. Additionally, it states that the records requested by the appellant are exempt from disclosure under KRS 439.510, as they are probation and parole records. The decision cites previous opinions to support the consistent application of this exemption.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Michael Mobley
Agency:
Department of Corrections
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2020 KY. AG LEXIS 454
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.