Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
17-ORD-027
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Michelle D. Harrison,Assistant Attorney Genera Open Records Decision Damon McCall, ApproveShield, LLC, initiated this appeal by letter dated January 5, 2017, challenging the disposition of his …
Damon McCall — Administrative Office of the Courts
Open Records Decision —
18-ORD-011
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Louisville Metro Department of Corrections ("LMDC") violated the Open Records …
Derrick Hargrove — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
19-ORD-006
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Sarah Ellen Eads Adkins,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The issue presented in this appeal is whether Louisville Metro Department of Corrections (LMDC) violated the Open Records Act …
James Lang — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
19-ORD-143
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Sarah Ellen Eads Adkins,Assistant Attorney General Summary : The Louisville Metro Department of Corrections appropriately denied the inmate's request per KRS 197.025(2) because he requested records …
Bobby Brock — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-202
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Marc Manley, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Darryn B. Sharber ("Appellant") claims that on September 2, 2020, he requested from the Department a copy of the negatives of x-rays …
Darryn B. Sharber — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-043
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision WAVE 3 News ("Appellant") requested from the Department a copy of a surveillance video that purportedly depicts a physical altercation …
WAVE 3 News — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-147
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Marc Manley, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Inmate Lewis Davenport (the "Appellant") submitted a request to the Administrative Office of the Courts to obtain a copy of his …
Lewis Davenport — Administrative Office of the Courts
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-034
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On January 19, 2022, Chad Heath ("Appellant") requested that AOC provide a copy of the "public official bonds" for two judges of …
Chad Heath — Administrative Office of the Courts
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-038
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On January 14, 2022, attorney Alan Rubin ("Appellant") requested copies of all surveillance footage from the Department showing …
Alan Rubin — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-049
Opinion Opinion By: Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Summary : The Louisville Metro Department of Corrections (the "Department") violated the Open Records Act ("the Act") when it failed to issue a response to a request to inspect records …
Glenn Odom — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-076
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On March 18, 2022, Josh Wood ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Department for "[a]ll 'inmate grievance forms' submitted by …
Josh Wood — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-086
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On April 2, 2022, Chad Heath ("Appellant") requested that AOC provide a copy of a "registration that is on file with the U.S. …
Chad Heath — Administrative Office of the Courts
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-096
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On April 7, 2022, Chad Heath ("Appellant") requested that AOC provide a copy of a "statement/filing showing that [a circuit …
Chad Heath — Administrative Office of the Courts
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-105
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On April 17, 2022, Chad Heath ("Appellant") requested that AOC provide a copy of an "Anti-Bribery Registration Statement that …
Chad Heath — Administrative Office of the Courts
23-ORD-012
23-ORD-012 January 26, 2023 In re: James Harrison/Administrative Office of the Courts Summary: The Open Records Act (“the Act”) does not apply to records of the Administrative Office of the Courts (“AOC”). Open Records Decision On March 27, 2022, …
James Harrison — Administrative Office of the Courts
23-ORD-347
23-ORD-347 December 28, 2023 In re: Jerry D. Lotz/Louisville Metro Department of Corrections Summary: Louisville Metro Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied an inmate’s request …
Jerry D. Lotz — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-185
24-ORD-185 August 28, 2024 In re: Makeda Charles/Louisville Metro Department of Corrections Summary: The Louisville Metro Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for …
Makeda Charles — Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.