Search AG Opinions & Decisions
24-ORD-027
24-ORD-027 February 6, 2024 In re: Reginald Grider Jr./ Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for …
Reginald Grider Jr. — Kentucky State Penitentiary
24-ORD-082
24-ORD-082 March 20, 2024 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office is unable to find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is unable to resolve …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-106
24-ORD-106 April 26, 2024 In re: Glen Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot resolve the factual …
Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-171
24-ORD-171 July 30, 2024 In re: Eugene Wade/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot resolve the factual …
Eugene Wade — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-170
24-ORD-170 July 30, 2024 In re: Uriah Pasha/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (the “Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not issue a notice to the requester containing the contact …
Uriah Pasha — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-168
24-ORD-168 July 30, 2024 In re: Randal Kiper/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do not contain a …
Randal Kiper — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-174
24-ORD-174 July 30, 2024 In re: Scott McDonnell/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for photos of a specific inmate that would …
Scott McDonnell — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-178
24-ORD-178 August 6, 2024 In re: Scott McDonnell/Department of Corrections Summary: The Office lacks jurisdiction to consider a complaint alleging that the Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) …
Scott McDonnell — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-263
24-ORD-263 December 9, 2024 In re: Carl Adkins/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for JPay emails between private …
Carl Adkins — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-007
25-ORD-007 January 7, 2025 In re: Vivian Miles/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it directed the Appellant to the public agency possessing the requested …
Vivian Miles — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-006
25-ORD-006 January 7, 2025 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided all responsive records it possesses. Open …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-024
25-ORD-024 January 28, 2025 In re: Karim Zein/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to cite the specific exception authorizing the …
Karim Zein — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-051
25-ORD-051 February 18, 2025 In re: Tim Arnold/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied two requests that did not precisely describe the …
Tim Arnold — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-049
25-ORD-049 February 18, 2025 In re: Alena Noakes/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied requests for records that, if released, could pose a …
Alena Noakes — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-048
25-ORD-048 February 18, 2025 In re: Jackie Jerome/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that are exempt under …
Jackie Jerome — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-060
25-ORD-060 March 7, 2025 In re: William Sharp/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it determined a request posed an unreasonable burden under KRS …
William Sharp — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-069
25-ORD-069 March 20, 2025 In re: Ben W. Richard, Jr./Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do not contain a …
Ben W. Richard, Jr. — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-078
25-ORD-078 March 24, 2025 In re: Stephanie Eng/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request that did not state the manner in which the …
Stephanie Eng — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-091
25-ORD-091 April 3, 2025 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it redacted records to remove information posing a security …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.