Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-007
25-ORD-007 January 7, 2025 In re: Vivian Miles/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it directed the Appellant to the public agency possessing the requested …
Vivian Miles — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-031
25-ORD-031 January 31, 2025 In re: Stephen Kininmonth/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Office cannot find that Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it claims to have provided all records …
Stephen Kininmonth — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-030
25-ORD-030 January 31, 2025 In re: Stephen Kininmonth/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that it does not possess. Metro also …
Stephen Kininmonth — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-032
25-ORD-032 February 3, 2025 In re: Ryan J. Dischinger/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response within five business days of receiving …
Ryan J. Dischinger — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-051
25-ORD-051 February 18, 2025 In re: Tim Arnold/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied two requests that did not precisely describe the …
Tim Arnold — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-049
25-ORD-049 February 18, 2025 In re: Alena Noakes/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied requests for records that, if released, could pose a …
Alena Noakes — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-060
25-ORD-060 March 7, 2025 In re: William Sharp/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it determined a request posed an unreasonable burden under KRS …
William Sharp — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-064
25-ORD-064 March 17, 2025 In re: Eric Ribenboim/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records for failure to certify a commercial purpose …
Eric Ribenboim — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-069
25-ORD-069 March 20, 2025 In re: Ben W. Richard, Jr./Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do not contain a …
Ben W. Richard, Jr. — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-078
25-ORD-078 March 24, 2025 In re: Stephanie Eng/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request that did not state the manner in which the …
Stephanie Eng — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-088
25-ORD-088 March 31, 2025 In re: Kaylae Price/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided all records responsive to a request and the requester did not …
Kaylae Price — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-086
25-ORD-086 March 31, 2025 In re: Ryan J. Dischinger/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it did not respond to …
Ryan J. Dischinger — Louisville Metro Government
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.