Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-088
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Dawn Crawford ("Appellant") submitted a 31-part request dated February 5, 2022, for various records and information. The …
Dawn Crawford — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-006
23-ORD-006 January 17, 2023 In re: Sean Southard/Office of the Governor Summary: The Office of the Governor (“the agency”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a communication pertaining to scheduling a …
Sean Southard — Office of the Governor
23-ORD-010
23-ORD-010 January 23, 2023 In re: Sean Southard/Office of the Governor Summary: The Office of the Governor (“the agency”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it redacted communications that were purely personal under KRS …
Sean Southard — Office of the Governor
23-ORD-016
23-ORD-016 January 30, 2023 In re: Kim Underwood/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it redacted pages of requested records without explaining how the …
Kim Underwood — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-056
23-ORD-056 March 14, 2023 In re: Sean Southard/Office of the Governor Summary: The Office of the Governor (the “Governor’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records because some portions are …
Sean Southard — Office of the Governor
23-ORD-262
23-ORD-262 October 2, 2023 In re: Antonio Dionte Williamson Trust/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that does …
Antonio Dionte Williamson Trust — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-270
23-ORD-270 October 10, 2023 In re: Eric Lloyd Hermansen/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that does not contain …
Eric Lloyd Hermansen — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-302
23-ORD-302 November 13, 2023 In re: Lewis Davenport/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open Records …
Lewis Davenport — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-348
23-ORD-348 December 28, 2023 In re: John Cheves/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it sought …
John Cheves — Department of Corrections
24-ORD-048
24-ORD-048 February 28, 2024 In re: Austin Horn/Office of the Governor Summary: The Office of the Governor (“the agency”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request as too imprecise and unreasonably burdensome. Open Records …
Austin Horn — Office of the Governor
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-162
24-ORD-162 July 18, 2024 In re: Joe Sonka/Office of the Governor Summary: The Office of the Governor (“the Agency”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open Records Decision Joe Sonka …
Joe Sonka — Office of the Governor
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-170
24-ORD-170 July 30, 2024 In re: Uriah Pasha/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (the “Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not issue a notice to the requester containing the contact …
Uriah Pasha — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-174
24-ORD-174 July 30, 2024 In re: Scott McDonnell/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for photos of a specific inmate that would …
Scott McDonnell — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-178
24-ORD-178 August 6, 2024 In re: Scott McDonnell/Department of Corrections Summary: The Office lacks jurisdiction to consider a complaint alleging that the Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) …
Scott McDonnell — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-230
24-ORD-230 October 25, 2024 In re: Kareem Jenkins/Office of the Governor Summary: The Office of the Governor (“the Agency”) committed a technical violation of Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request within five days as …
Kareem Jenkins — Office of the Governor
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-007
25-ORD-007 January 7, 2025 In re: Vivian Miles/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it directed the Appellant to the public agency possessing the requested …
Vivian Miles — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-051
25-ORD-051 February 18, 2025 In re: Tim Arnold/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied two requests that did not precisely describe the …
Tim Arnold — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-049
25-ORD-049 February 18, 2025 In re: Alena Noakes/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied requests for records that, if released, could pose a …
Alena Noakes — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-060
25-ORD-060 March 7, 2025 In re: William Sharp/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it determined a request posed an unreasonable burden under KRS …
William Sharp — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-069
25-ORD-069 March 20, 2025 In re: Ben W. Richard, Jr./Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do not contain a …
Ben W. Richard, Jr. — Department of Corrections
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.