Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
00-ORD-035
Request By: [NO REQUESTBY IN ORIGINAL] Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records …
Donald Starks — Gallatin Circuit Court Clerk
Open Records Decision —
05-ORD-269
Opinion Opinion By: Gregory D. Stumbo, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being …
Michael Linde — Gallatin Circuit Court Clerk
Open Records Decision —
10-ORD-175
Opinion Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently …
Charles Helton — Kentucky Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
17-ORD-253
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;J. Marcus Jones,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Kentucky Department of Corrections ("DOC") violated the Kentucky Open Records Act …
Dwight A. Haynes — Kentucky Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
18-ORD-042
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear, Attorney General; J. Marcus Jones, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On January 4, 2018, inmate Robert McKinney dated and submitted an Open Records Request to the Kentucky Department of Corrections …
Robert McKinney — Kentucky Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
18-ORD-232
Opinion Opinion By: Andy BeshearAttorney General;Sarah Ellen Eads AdkinsAssistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Department of Corrections ("DOC") violated the Open Records Act in denying …
Uriah Pasha — Kentucky Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-144
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Summary : The Kentucky Department of Corrections (the "Department") did not violate the Open Records Act ("the Act") when it denied inspection of records …
Holly Harrison-Hawkins — Kentucky Department of Corrections
22-ORD-270
22-ORD-270 December 15, 2022 In re: Uriah Pasha/Gallatin Circuit Court Clerk Summary: The Open Records Act (“the Act”) does not apply to records of the Gallatin Circuit Court Clerk (“the Clerk”). Open Records Decision Uriah Pasha (“Appellant”) …
Uriah Pasha — Gallatin Circuit Court Clerk
23-ORD-036
23-ORD-036 February 16, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: This Office cannot find that the Kentucky Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because this Office is …
Lawrence Trageser — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-046
23-ORD-046 March 1, 2023 In re: Chris Douglas Hawkins/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Kentucky Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it responded to a request to inspect …
Chris Douglas Hawkins — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-049
23-ORD-049 March 3, 2023 In re: Armstead Baylor/Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to inform a requesting inmate that …
Marvin T. Pennington — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-048
23-ORD-048 March 3, 2023 In re: Marvin T. Pennington/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that …
Marvin T. Pennington — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-254
23-ORD-254 September 19, 2023 In re: Michael Howard/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Kentucky Department of Corrections (the “Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide the Appellant with a …
Michael Howard — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-338
23-ORD-338 December 18, 2023 In re: Sasha Torchinsky/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for recorded telephone calls that …
Sasha Torchinsky — Kentucky Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-117
24-ORD-117 May 9, 2024 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky Department of Corrections (the “Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot resolve …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-130
24-ORD-130 May 31, 2024 In re: Stephen Spieth/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Kentucky Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld the Appellant’s Sex Offender …
Stephen Spieth — Kentucky Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-268
24-ORD-268 December 12, 2024 In re: Christopher Duncan/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Kentucky Department of Corrections (the “Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that …
Christopher Duncan — Kentucky Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-277
24-ORD-277 December 23, 2024 In re: Demetrious Brown/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Kentucky Department of Corrections (the “Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do …
Demetrious Brown — Kentucky Department of Corrections
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.