Search AG Opinions & Decisions
23-ORD-036
23-ORD-036 February 16, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: This Office cannot find that the Kentucky Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because this Office is …
Lawrence Trageser — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-045
23-ORD-045 February 27, 2023 In re: Leonel Martinez/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (“the Center”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do not reference the Appellant. …
Leonel Martinez — Lee Adjustment Center
23-ORD-046
23-ORD-046 March 1, 2023 In re: Chris Douglas Hawkins/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Kentucky Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it responded to a request to inspect …
Chris Douglas Hawkins — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-049
23-ORD-049 March 3, 2023 In re: Armstead Baylor/Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to inform a requesting inmate that …
Marvin T. Pennington — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-048
23-ORD-048 March 3, 2023 In re: Marvin T. Pennington/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that …
Marvin T. Pennington — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-090
23-ORD-090 April 18, 2023 In re: Leonel Martinez/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (the “Center”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that no longer existed within its …
Leonel Martinez — Lee Adjustment Center
23-ORD-094
23-ORD-094 April 26, 2023 In re: Leonel Martinez/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (the “Center”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not review responsive records to determine if its stated exceptions …
Leonel Martinez — Lee Adjustment Center
23-ORD-166
23-ORD-166 July 11, 2023 In re: Johnny Lee Cissell/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (the “Center”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when its response failed to properly invoke KRS 61.872(5) to delay access to the …
Johnny Lee Cissell — Lee Adjustment Center
23-ORD-254
23-ORD-254 September 19, 2023 In re: Michael Howard/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Kentucky Department of Corrections (the “Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide the Appellant with a …
Michael Howard — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-308
23-ORD-308 November 14, 2023 In re: Anthony Sadler/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (“the Center”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records it does not possess. Open Records …
Anthony Sadler — Lee Adjustment Center
23-ORD-338
23-ORD-338 December 18, 2023 In re: Sasha Torchinsky/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for recorded telephone calls that …
Sasha Torchinsky — Kentucky Department of Corrections
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.