Search AG Opinions & Decisions
23-ORD-007
23-ORD-007 January 18, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/ Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision …
Lawrence Trageser — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-036
23-ORD-036 February 16, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: This Office cannot find that the Kentucky Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because this Office is …
Lawrence Trageser — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-038
23-ORD-038 February 20, 2023 In re: Alan Rubin / Louisville Metro Government Summary: Because the requester has made a prima facie case that a public record should exist, Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the …
Alan Rubin — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-046
23-ORD-046 March 1, 2023 In re: Chris Douglas Hawkins/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Kentucky Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it responded to a request to inspect …
Chris Douglas Hawkins — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-049
23-ORD-049 March 3, 2023 In re: Armstead Baylor/Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to inform a requesting inmate that …
Marvin T. Pennington — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-048
23-ORD-048 March 3, 2023 In re: Marvin T. Pennington/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that …
Marvin T. Pennington — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-087
23-ORD-087 April 17, 2023 In re: Western States Media/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for automobile collision reports under KRS …
Western States Media — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-135
23-ORD-135 June 13, 2023 In re: J. Brooken Smith/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to make a timely response to two open records requests. Open …
J. Brooken Smith — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-138
23-ORD-138 June 20, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue responses within five business days of receiving requests …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-207
23-ORD-207 August 9, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld a “preliminary draft” under KRS 61.878(1)(i). Open Records …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-254
23-ORD-254 September 19, 2023 In re: Michael Howard/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Kentucky Department of Corrections (the “Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide the Appellant with a …
Michael Howard — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-253
23-ORD-253 September 19, 2023 In re: Bill Hollander/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records …
Bill Hollander — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-292
23-ORD-292 November 1, 2023 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Metro also violated …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-333
23-ORD-333 December 14, 2023 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its final response …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-334
23-ORD-334 December 14, 2023 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its final response …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-338
23-ORD-338 December 18, 2023 In re: Sasha Torchinsky/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for recorded telephone calls that …
Sasha Torchinsky — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-346
23-ORD-346 December 28, 2023 In re: Nicolas Horne/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it delayed access to …
Nicolas Horne — Louisville Metro Government
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.