Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
19-ORD-196
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;J. Marcus Jones,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether Louisville Metro Government ("Louisville Metro") violated the Open Records Act …
Ann Ramser — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-056
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;J. Marcus Jones,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 18, 2019, Jason Eye ("Appellant") emailed a request for records to Metro seeking records from the Department of Codes …
Jason Eye — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-116
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On March 2, 2020, Bret Walker ("Appellant") requested that Metro provide copies of certain waivers issued between January 1 and …
Bret Walker — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-135
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On June 21, 2020, Joshua Poe ("Appellant") requested certain data concerning property code violations, and Metro provided the …
Joshua Poe — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-192
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel CameronAttorney GeneralMarc ManleyAssistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On September 2, 2020, Kevin Dohn ("Appellant") requested to inspect all applications and permits that Metro had received relating to the …
Kevin Dohn — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-089
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Michael P. Abate ("Appellant") asked Metro to provide a copy of "the first draft" of a report that Hillard Heintze presented to Mayor …
Michael P. Abate — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-097
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On March 5, 2021, Lawrence Trageser ("Appellant") asked Metro for a copy of a specific police officer's personnel file. Having …
Lawrence Trageser — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-150
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On June 8, 2021, The Courier-Journal ("Appellant") requested "[a]ny completed Human Resources investigation into [a named …
The Courier-Journal — Louisville Metro Government
22-ORD-268
22-ORD-268 December 15, 2022 In re: Josh Wood/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond within five business days to three of seven requests it …
Josh Wood — Louisville Metro Government
22-ORD-273
22-ORD-273 December 19, 2022 In re: Matthew Bunnell/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a timely written response to a request to inspect …
Matthew Bunnell — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-007
23-ORD-007 January 18, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/ Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision …
Lawrence Trageser — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-038
23-ORD-038 February 20, 2023 In re: Alan Rubin / Louisville Metro Government Summary: Because the requester has made a prima facie case that a public record should exist, Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the …
Alan Rubin — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-087
23-ORD-087 April 17, 2023 In re: Western States Media/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for automobile collision reports under KRS …
Western States Media — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-135
23-ORD-135 June 13, 2023 In re: J. Brooken Smith/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to make a timely response to two open records requests. Open …
J. Brooken Smith — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-138
23-ORD-138 June 20, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue responses within five business days of receiving requests …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-207
23-ORD-207 August 9, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld a “preliminary draft” under KRS 61.878(1)(i). Open Records …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-253
23-ORD-253 September 19, 2023 In re: Bill Hollander/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records …
Bill Hollander — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-292
23-ORD-292 November 1, 2023 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Metro also violated …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-333
23-ORD-333 December 14, 2023 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its final response …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-334
23-ORD-334 December 14, 2023 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying its final response …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.