Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-128
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Ashley Gruner ("Appellant") asked KSP to inspect records related to an unsolved homicide case that occurred in Western Kentucky …
Ashley Gruner — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-259
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On November 15, 2021, Ashley Gruner ("Appellant") requested a copy of the records pertaining to KSP's investigation of an …
Ashley Gruner — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-005
Opinion Opinion By: James M. HerrickAssistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On November 15, 2021, Ashley Gruner ("Appellant") requested a copy of the records pertaining to KSP's investigation of an unsolved homicide case that occurred in …
Ashley Gruner — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-011
Opinion Opinion By: Matthew RayAssistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On November 9, 2021, Ashley Gruner ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Department for a copy of the case file related to a specific missing person who was last seen …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-109
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") requested copies of various records pertaining to the execution of a search …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-157
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On June 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Sheriff's Office to inspect all body camera footage related to …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-175
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On July 12, 2022, Phillip Hamm submitted a request to the Sheriff's Office for a copy of a list of all the open records requests that …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-178
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") requested copies of various records pertaining to the execution of a search …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-203
22-ORD-203 October 7, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that is …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-205
22-ORD-205 October 7, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-214
22-ORD-214 October 14, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records. …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-039
23-ORD-039 February 20, 2023 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-057
23-ORD-057 March 15, 2023 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request to inspect in-person an …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-138
23-ORD-138 June 20, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue responses within five business days of receiving requests …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-207
23-ORD-207 August 9, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld a “preliminary draft” under KRS 61.878(1)(i). Open Records …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-044
24-ORD-044 February 21, 2024 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for certified copies …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
24-ORD-064
24-ORD-064 March 15, 2024 In re: Ashley Gruner/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for intelligence and investigative reports before prosecution …
Ashley Gruner — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-052
25-ORD-052 February 27, 2025 In re: Ashley Gruner/Northern Kentucky University Summary: Northern Kentucky University (“the University”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not grant or deny the Appellant’s request within five …
Ashley Gruner — Northern Kentucky University
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.