Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
16-ORD-034
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Matt James,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The questions presented in this appeal are whether the Ludlow Police Department ("LPD") violated the Open Records Act in failing to state …
Cincinnati Enquirer — Ludlow Police Department
Open Records Decision —
16-ORD-088
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Matt James,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The questions presented in this appeal are whether the Kentucky State Police ("KSP") violated the Open Records Act in 1) failing to respond …
Cincinnati Enquirer — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
16-ORD-085
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Matt James,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the City of Independence ("Independence") violated the Open Records Act in withholding a …
Cincinnati Enquirer — City of Independence
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-109
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") requested copies of various records pertaining to the execution of a search …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-157
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On June 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Sheriff's Office to inspect all body camera footage related to …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-175
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On July 12, 2022, Phillip Hamm submitted a request to the Sheriff's Office for a copy of a list of all the open records requests that …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-178
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") requested copies of various records pertaining to the execution of a search …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-203
22-ORD-203 October 7, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that is …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-205
22-ORD-205 October 7, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-214
22-ORD-214 October 14, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records. …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-039
23-ORD-039 February 20, 2023 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-057
23-ORD-057 March 15, 2023 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request to inspect in-person an …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
24-ORD-044
24-ORD-044 February 21, 2024 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for certified copies …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-106
25-ORD-106 April 24, 2025 In re: Cincinnati Enquirer/City of Covington Summary: The City of Covington (“the City”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of employee performance evaluations under KRS 61.878(1)(a). …
Cincinnati Enquirer — City of Covington
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.