Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Meetings Decision —
01-OMD-030
Opinion Opinion By: ALBERT B. CHANDLER III,ATTORNEY GENERAL;Amye L. Bensenhaver,Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Hopkins County Fiscal Court violated the Open Meetings Act when a …
Elbert Powell — Hopkins County Fiscal Court
Open Records Decision —
01-ORD-233
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; James M. Ringo, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Hopkins County Fiscal Court violated the Open Records Act in …
Elbert Powell — Hopkins County Fiscal Court
Open Records Decision —
02-ORD-053
Request By: Elbert Powell P.O. Box 601 Nortonville, KY 42442Richard L. Frymire Hopkins County Judge/Executive Courthouse 10 S. Main Street Madisonville, KY 42431Robert P. Moore Hopkins County Attorney Courthouse Annex 24 E. Center Street …
Elbert Powell — Hopkins County Fiscal Court
Open Meetings Decision —
03-OMD-221
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Hopkins County Fiscal Court complied with KRS 61.815(1)(a) …
Elbert Powell — Hopkins County Fiscal Court
Open Meetings Decision —
03-OMD-250
Opinion Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Nortonville City Council violated the Open Meetings Act in …
Elbert Powell — Nortonville City Council
Open Records Decision —
04-ORD-007
Request By: Elbert A. Powell 116 South Hopkinsville Street P.O. Box 601 Nortonville, KY 42442Terry Jones Central Dispatcher 99 East Center Street Madisonville, KY 42431Joe A. Evans III City Attorney P.O. Box 695 Madisonville, KY 42431 Opinion …
Elbert Powell — Madisonville-Hopkins County Central Dispatch and City of Madisonville
Open Records Decision —
18-ORD-177
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government ("LFUCG") Division of Police …
Tanyqua Oliver — Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Division of Police
Open Meetings Decision —
19-OMD-187
Opinion Opinion By: Andy Beshear, Attorney General; Michelle D. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government ("LFUCG") Ethics Commission …
Tanyqua Oliver — Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Ethics Commission
Open Meetings Decision —
20-OMD-018
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Meetings Decision The question presented in this appeal is whether Fayette Circuit Judge Ernesto Scorsone ("Judge Scorsone") violated the Open …
Tanyqua Oliver — Fayette Circuit Judge Ernesto Scorsone
24-OMD-083
24-OMD-083 March 22, 2024 In re: Tanyqua Oliver/Louisville Metro Department of Codes and Regulations Summary: The Louisville Metro Department of Codes and Regulations (“Metro”) violated the Open Meetings Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a …
Tanyqua Oliver — Louisville Metro Department of Codes and Regulations
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-239
24-ORD-239 November 15, 2024 In re: Tanyqua Oliver/Fayette County Public Schools Summary: Fayette County Public Schools (“FCPS”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a copy of school surveillance video under …
Tanyqua Oliver — Fayette County Public Schools
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-003
25-ORD-003 January 2, 2025 In re: Tanyqua Oliver/Fayette County Public Schools Summary: The Office cannot find that the Fayette County Public Schools (“FCPS”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided what the Appellant considered …
Tanyqua Oliver — Fayette County Public Schools
Open Meetings Decision —
25-OMD-020
25-OMD-020 January 28, 2025 In re: Tanyqua Oliver/Fayette County Board of Education Summary: The Fayette County Board of Education (“the Board”) did not violate the Open Meetings Act (“the Act”) when it held a private reception prior to its official …
Tanyqua Oliver — Fayette County Board of Education
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-037
25-ORD-037 February 11, 2025 In re: Tanyqua Oliver/Fayette County Public School System Summary: The Fayette County Public School System (“FCPS”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request seeking information without …
Tanyqua Oliver — Fayette County Public School System
Open Meetings Decision —
25-OMD-057
25-OMD-057 March 4, 2025 In re: Tanyqua Oliver/Lexington–Fayette Urban County Government Administrative Hearings Board Summary: The Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Administrative Hearings Board (“the Board”) did not violate the Open …
Tanyqua Oliver — Lexington–Fayette Urban County Government Administrative Hearings Board
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-068
25-ORD-068 March 18, 2025 In re: Tanyqua Oliver/Lexington–Fayette Urban County Government Summary: The Office cannot find that the Lexington–Fayette Urban County Government (“LFUCG”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is …
Tanyqua Oliver — Lexington–Fayette Urban County Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-099
25-ORD-099 April 8, 2025 In re: Tanyqua Oliver/Fayette County Public School System Summary: The Fayette County School System (“FCPS”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it issued a timely response, denied a request for records …
Tanyqua Oliver — Fayette County Public School System
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.