Search AG Opinions & Decisions
23-ORD-005
23-ORD-005 January 13, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Jeffersontown Fire Protection District Summary: This Office cannot find that the Jeffersontown Fire Protection District (the “District”) failed to issue a timely response to a request to inspect …
Lawrence Trageser — Jeffersontown Fire Protection District
23-ORD-007
23-ORD-007 January 18, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/ Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision …
Lawrence Trageser — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-027
23-ORD-027 February 7, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: This Office cannot find the Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided what the requester considers …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-032
23-ORD-032 February 13, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Jeffersontown Fire Protection District Summary: The Jeffersontown Fire Protection District (“the District”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide a record that …
Lawrence Trageser — Jeffersontown Fire Protection District
23-ORD-036
23-ORD-036 February 16, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: This Office cannot find that the Kentucky Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because this Office is …
Lawrence Trageser — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-062
23-ORD-062 March 20, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: This Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provides proof it timely issued …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-076
23-ORD-076 March 30, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Louisville Metro Animal Services Summary: Louisville Metro Animal Services (“the agency”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied an imprecise request for records because it …
Lawrence Trageser — Louisville Metro Animal Services
23-ORD-086
23-ORD-086 April 13, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Spencer County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The Spencer County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to advise a requester that requested …
Lawrence Trageser — Spencer County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-105
23-ORD-105 May 8, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it issued a timely response to a request to inspect records. …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-111
23-ORD-111 May 22, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not subvert the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it …
Lawrence Trageser — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-186
23-ORD-186 July 26, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office is unable to find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request for …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-193
23-ORD-193 August 1, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is unable to resolve the …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.