Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-206
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Kyle Thompson ("Appellant") requested copies from the Clerk of certain grand jury records of the Hardin Circuit Court. After …
Kyle Thompson — Hardin Circuit Court Clerk
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-215
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Kyle Thompson ("Appellant") requested certain records from the Clerk relating to his grand jury proceedings before the Hardin …
Kyle Thompson — Hardin Circuit Court Clerk
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-230
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Kyle Thompson ("Appellant") requested copies from the Clerk of certain grand jury records of the Hardin Circuit Court. The Clerk …
Kyle Thompson — Hardin Circuit Court Clerk
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-109
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") requested copies of various records pertaining to the execution of a search …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-119
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Inmate Kyle Thompson ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Reformatory for "a copy of the memo from 11/14/2018," which he …
Kyle Thompson — Kentucky State Reformatory
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-157
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On June 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Sheriff's Office to inspect all body camera footage related to …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-175
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On July 12, 2022, Phillip Hamm submitted a request to the Sheriff's Office for a copy of a list of all the open records requests that …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-178
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") requested copies of various records pertaining to the execution of a search …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-203
22-ORD-203 October 7, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that is …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-205
22-ORD-205 October 7, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-214
22-ORD-214 October 14, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records. …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-039
23-ORD-039 February 20, 2023 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-057
23-ORD-057 March 15, 2023 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request to inspect in-person an …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-272
23-ORD-272 October 10, 2023 In re: Kyle Thompson/Little Sandy Correctional Complex Summary: The Little Sandy Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied an inmate’s request to inspect records without …
Kyle Thompson — Little Sandy Correctional Complex
24-ORD-044
24-ORD-044 February 21, 2024 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for certified copies …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-173
24-ORD-173 July 30, 2024 In re: Kyle Thompson/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Office cannot find that the Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a …
Kyle Thompson — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-257
24-ORD-257 December 3, 2024 In re: Kyle Thompson/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Office cannot find that the Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (the “Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot …
Kyle Thompson — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-015
25-ORD-015 January 15, 2025 In re: Kyle Thompson/Little Sandy Correctional Complex Summary: The Little Sandy Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied an inmate’s request for employee emails …
Kyle Thompson — Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-065
25-ORD-065 March 17, 2025 In re: Kyle Thompson/Little Sandy Correctional Complex Summary: The Office cannot find that the Little Sandy Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot resolve …
Kyle Thompson — Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.