Search AG Opinions & Decisions
23-ORD-005
23-ORD-005 January 13, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Jeffersontown Fire Protection District Summary: This Office cannot find that the Jeffersontown Fire Protection District (the “District”) failed to issue a timely response to a request to inspect …
Lawrence Trageser — Jeffersontown Fire Protection District
23-ORD-007
23-ORD-007 January 18, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/ Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision …
Lawrence Trageser — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-008
23-ORD-008 January 20, 2023 In re: Leonel Martinez/City of Owensboro Summary: Under 40 KAR 1:030 § 4, the Attorney General shall not reconsider a prior decision rendered under the Open Records Act (“the Act”). This Office will not reconsider …
Leonel Martinez — City of Owensboro
23-ORD-032
23-ORD-032 February 13, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Jeffersontown Fire Protection District Summary: The Jeffersontown Fire Protection District (“the District”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide a record that …
Lawrence Trageser — Jeffersontown Fire Protection District
23-ORD-036
23-ORD-036 February 16, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: This Office cannot find that the Kentucky Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because this Office is …
Lawrence Trageser — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-045
23-ORD-045 February 27, 2023 In re: Leonel Martinez/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (“the Center”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do not reference the Appellant. …
Leonel Martinez — Lee Adjustment Center
23-ORD-076
23-ORD-076 March 30, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Louisville Metro Animal Services Summary: Louisville Metro Animal Services (“the agency”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied an imprecise request for records because it …
Lawrence Trageser — Louisville Metro Animal Services
23-ORD-086
23-ORD-086 April 13, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Spencer County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The Spencer County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to advise a requester that requested …
Lawrence Trageser — Spencer County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-090
23-ORD-090 April 18, 2023 In re: Leonel Martinez/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (the “Center”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that no longer existed within its …
Leonel Martinez — Lee Adjustment Center
23-ORD-094
23-ORD-094 April 26, 2023 In re: Leonel Martinez/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (the “Center”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not review responsive records to determine if its stated exceptions …
Leonel Martinez — Lee Adjustment Center
23-ORD-111
23-ORD-111 May 22, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not subvert the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it …
Lawrence Trageser — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.