Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-109
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") requested copies of various records pertaining to the execution of a search …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-157
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On June 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Sheriff's Office to inspect all body camera footage related to …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-175
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On July 12, 2022, Phillip Hamm submitted a request to the Sheriff's Office for a copy of a list of all the open records requests that …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-178
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") requested copies of various records pertaining to the execution of a search …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-203
22-ORD-203 October 7, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that is …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-205
22-ORD-205 October 7, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-214
22-ORD-214 October 14, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records. …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-039
23-ORD-039 February 20, 2023 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-057
23-ORD-057 March 15, 2023 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request to inspect in-person an …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
24-ORD-044
24-ORD-044 February 21, 2024 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for certified copies …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-032
25-ORD-032 February 3, 2025 In re: Ryan J. Dischinger/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response within five business days of receiving …
Ryan J. Dischinger — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-086
25-ORD-086 March 31, 2025 In re: Ryan J. Dischinger/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it did not respond to …
Ryan J. Dischinger — Louisville Metro Government
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.