Search AG Opinions & Decisions
23-ORD-196
23-ORD-196 August 1, 2023 In re: Peter Trzop/Nelson County School District Summary: The Nelson County School District (“the District”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open Records …
Peter Trzop — Nelson County School District
23-ORD-194
23-ORD-194 August 1, 2023 In re: Melissa Barlow/Mount Sterling Police Department Summary: The Mount Sterling Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records …
Melissa Barlow — Mount Sterling Police Department
23-ORD-198
23-ORD-198 August 1, 2023 In re: Tanner Watkins/City of Prospect Summary: The City of Prospect (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it invoked KRS 61.872(5) to delay access to records without stating the earliest date on which …
Tanner Watkins — City of Prospect
23-ORD-199
23-ORD-199 August 3, 2023 In re: Mark Sommer/Kentucky Department of Revenue Summary: The Kentucky Department of Revenue (the “Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for redacted copies of taxpayer settlement …
Mark Sommer — Kentucky Department of Revenue
23-ORD-202
23-ORD-202 August 7, 2023 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Spencer County Attorney’s Office Summary: The Spencer County Attorney’s Office (“the agency”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it could not provide records that are not within …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Spencer County Attorney’s Office
23-ORD-201
23-ORD-201 August 7, 2023 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Shelbyville Police Department Summary: In the face of competing factual claims, the Office cannot find that the Shelbyville Police Department (the “Department”) “required” the use of a specific form …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Shelbyville Police Department
23-ORD-200
23-ORD-200 August 7, 2023 In re: John Fairley/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open Records Decision Inmate John …
John Fairley — Kentucky State Police
23-ORD-203
23-ORD-203 August 8, 2023 In re: Whitney Marion/Oldham County Schools Summary: The Oldham County Schools (“the agency”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist Open Records Decision On June …
Whitney Marion — Oldham County Schools
23-ORD-204
23-ORD-204 August 8, 2023 In re: Ronald Mitchell/Kentucky Board of Veterinary Examiners Summary: The Kentucky Board of Veterinary Examiners (“the Board”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it delayed access to records because it is …
Ronald Mitchell — Kentucky Board of Veterinary Examiners
23-OMD-205
23-OMD-205 August 9, 2023 In re: The Levisa Lazer/Lawrence County Fiscal Court Summary: The Lawrence County Fiscal Court (“the Fiscal Court”) violated the Open Meetings Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a written response to a complaint within …
The Levisa Lazer — Lawrence County Fiscal Court
23-ORD-206
23-ORD-206 August 9, 2023 In re: Mark Shouse/Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Summary: The Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect …
Mark Shouse — Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government
23-ORD-207
23-ORD-207 August 9, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld a “preliminary draft” under KRS 61.878(1)(i). Open Records …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-210
23-ORD-210 August 11, 2023 In re: Teresa Gilbert/Pulaski County Clerk Summary: The Pulaski County Clerk (the “Clerk”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when he failed to respond to a request to inspect records within five business days. …
Teresa Gilbert — Pulaski County Clerk
23-ORD-209
23-ORD-209 August 11, 2023 In re: Wayne Thompson/Department of Financial Institutions Summary: The Department of Financial Institutions (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it redacted the names of mortgage …
Wayne Thompson — Department of Financial Institutions
23-ORD-211
23-ORD-211 August 11, 2023 In re: Teresa Gilbert/Casey County Clerk Summary: The Casey County Clerk (the “Clerk”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when he failed to respond to a request to inspect records within five business days. However, …
Teresa Gilbert — Casey County Clerk
23-ORD-212
23-ORD-212 August 11, 2023 In re: Michael Bryant/Richmond Police Department Summary: The Richmond Police Department (the “Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record under KRS 61.878(1)(h) and KRS …
Michael Bryant — Richmond Police Department
23-ORD-208
23-ORD-208 August 11, 2023 In re: Rebecca Mash/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided all records in its custody or control that were responsive to a …
Rebecca Mash — Kentucky State Police
23-ORD-216
23-ORD-216 August 14, 2023 In re: Bobbie Coleman/Letcher County Clerk Summary: The Letcher County Clerk (the “Clerk”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when he failed to respond to a request for records within five business days. The Clerk …
Bobbie Coleman — Letcher County Clerk
23-ORD-215
23-ORD-215 August 14, 2023 In re: Bobbie Coleman/Harlan County Clerk Summary: The Harlan County Clerk (the “Clerk”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when she imposed a fee in excess of the actual cost to reproduce a record. Open Records …
Bobbie Coleman — Harlan County Clerk
23-ORD-213
23-ORD-213 August 14, 2023 In re: Courtney Gilbert/Green County Clerk Summary: The Green County Clerk (the “Clerk”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when she failed to respond to a request to inspect records within five business days. The …
Courtney Gilbert — Green County Clerk
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.