Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-104
25-ORD-104 April 15, 2025 In re: Nycea Elder/Administrative Office of the Courts Summary: The Open Records Act (“the Act”) does not apply to records of the Administrative Office of the Courts (“AOC”). Open Records Decision On February 25, 2025, …
Nycea Elder — Administrative Office of the Courts
Open Meetings Decision —
25-OMD-103
25-OMD-103 April 15, 2025 In re: Rob Mattheu/Oldham County Fiscal Court Summary: The Oldham County Fiscal Court (“the Fiscal Court”) violated the Open Meetings Act (“the Act”) when it discussed public business in closed session. KRS 61.810(1)(g) …
Rob Mattheu — Oldham County Fiscal Court
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-102
25-ORD-102 April 15, 2025 In re: Olivia Tipton/Oldham County School District Summary: The Oldham County School District (“the District”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a timely written response stating that certain …
Olivia Tipton — Oldham County School District
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-106
25-ORD-106 April 24, 2025 In re: Cincinnati Enquirer/City of Covington Summary: The City of Covington (“the City”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of employee performance evaluations under KRS 61.878(1)(a). …
Cincinnati Enquirer — City of Covington
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-105
25-ORD-105 April 24, 2025 In re: Angele Maley/Oldham County Police Department Summary: The Oldham County Police Department (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request that did not state how the …
Angele Maley — Oldham County Police Department
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-107
25-ORD-107 April 25, 2025 In re: Kurt Wallace/Prosecutors Advisory Council Summary: The Prosecutors Advisory Council (“the Council”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records within five …
Kurt Wallace — Prosecutors Advisory Council
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-112
25-ORD-112 April 30, 2025 In re: William Cope/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it declined to provide copies of records to the inmate …
William Cope — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-111
25-ORD-111 April 30, 2025 In re: Jeffrey Gegler/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records it does not possess. KSP violated the Act when it …
Jeffrey Gegler — Kentucky State Police
Open Meetings Decision —
25-OMD-110
25-OMD-110 April 30, 2025 In re: Jason O’Bannon/London City Council Summary: In appeals to the Office under the Open Meetings Act (“the Act”), the Office cannot resolve factual disputes or determine the credibility of witnesses. Accordingly, the …
Jason O’Bannon — London City Council
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-109
25-ORD-109 April 30, 2025 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Shelbyville Police Department Summary: The Shelbyville Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to substantiate the fees imposed in its original …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Shelbyville Police Department
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-108
25-ORD-108 April 30, 2025 In re: Rebekah Atkins/Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided all records in its possession …
Rebekah Atkins — Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-116
25-ORD-116 May 2, 2025 In re: Scooter Cook/Office of the Attorney General Summary: The Office of the Attorney General (“the Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it required requests to be signed by the requester and to …
Scooter Cook — Office of the Attorney General
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-115
25-ORD-115 May 2, 2025 In re: Kurt Wallace/Bullitt County Detention Center Summary: The Bullitt County Detention Center (“the Jail”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records within five …
Kurt Wallace — Bullitt County Detention Center
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-114
25-ORD-114 May 2, 2025 In re: David Gardner/City of Salyersville Summary: The City of Salyersville (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it delayed the Appellant’s access to records beyond five business days without properly …
David Gardner — City of Salyersville
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-113
25-ORD-113 May 2, 2025 In re: Danny Maiden/Office of the Attorney General Summary: The Office of the Attorney General (“the Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it invoked KRS 61.878(1)(i) and (j) to withhold records. Open …
Danny Maiden — Office of the Attorney General
Open Meetings Decision —
25-OMD-117
25-OMD-117 May 5, 2025 In re: Robin Vessels/Oldham County Fiscal Court Summary: The Oldham County Fiscal Court (“the Fiscal Court”) violated the Open Meetings Act (“the Act”) when it discussed public business in closed session. KRS 61.810(1)(g) does …
Robin Vessels — Oldham County Fiscal Court
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-118
25-ORD-118 May 9, 2025 In re: Sophie Pruitt/Ashland Independent School District Summary: The Ashland Independent School District (“the School District”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records it does not …
Sophie Pruitt — Ashland Independent School District
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-119
25-ORD-119 May 13, 2025 In re: EWU Media/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for public records on the basis of the requester’s …
EWU Media — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-123
25-ORD-123 May 14, 2025 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response to two requests to …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-122
25-ORD-122 May 14, 2025 In re: Joshua Adams/Montgomery County Jail Summary: The Office cannot find that the Montgomery County Jail (“the Jail”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot resolve the factual dispute between …
Joshua Adams — Montgomery County Jail
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.