Search AG Opinions & Decisions
22-ORD-268
22-ORD-268 December 15, 2022 In re: Josh Wood/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond within five business days to three of seven requests it …
Josh Wood — Louisville Metro Government
22-ORD-273
22-ORD-273 December 19, 2022 In re: Matthew Bunnell/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a timely written response to a request to inspect …
Matthew Bunnell — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-002
23-ORD-002 January 3, 2023 In re: Melanie Barker/ Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-007
23-ORD-007 January 18, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/ Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision …
Lawrence Trageser — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-038
23-ORD-038 February 20, 2023 In re: Alan Rubin / Louisville Metro Government Summary: Because the requester has made a prima facie case that a public record should exist, Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the …
Alan Rubin — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-042
23-ORD-042 February 22, 2023 In re: Vivian Miles/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to adequately explain its search for …
Vivian Miles — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-052
23-ORD-052 March 8, 2023 In re: Denise Steenbergen/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not determine within five business …
Denise Steenbergen — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-068
23-ORD-068 March 27, 2023 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because it was not obligated to create a …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-066
23-ORD-066 March 27, 2023 In re: David McAnally/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for copies that did …
David McAnally — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-079
23-ORD-079 April 4, 2023 In re: David McAnally/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), …
David McAnally — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-084
23-ORD-084 April 13, 2023 In re: LuvShenda Howard/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (the “Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records without …
LuvShenda Howard — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-087
23-ORD-087 April 17, 2023 In re: Western States Media/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for automobile collision reports under KRS …
Western States Media — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-116
23-ORD-116 May 31, 2023 In re: Staci Ray/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it redacted records and denied a request to inspect emails …
Staci Ray — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-129
23-ORD-129 June 12, 2023 In re: Morgan Adams/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (the “Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request without adequately explaining …
Morgan Adams — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-135
23-ORD-135 June 13, 2023 In re: J. Brooken Smith/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to make a timely response to two open records requests. Open …
J. Brooken Smith — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-138
23-ORD-138 June 20, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue responses within five business days of receiving requests …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-160
23-ORD-160 July 5, 2023 In re: Stephen D. Gruner/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (the “Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response granting or …
Stephen D. Gruner — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-190
23-ORD-190 July 27, 2023 In re: Vivian Miles/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: This Office cannot find that the Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a …
Vivian Miles — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-207
23-ORD-207 August 9, 2023 In re: Ashley Gruner/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld a “preliminary draft” under KRS 61.878(1)(i). Open Records …
Ashley Gruner — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-225
23-ORD-225 August 21, 2023 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (the “Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond properly to a request to …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.