Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-184
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Charlie Dietz ("Appellant") requested from the Cabinet a copy of "[a]ll reports generated, logs and data collected from reports made" to …
Charlie Dietz — Kentucky Labor Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-197
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Marc Manley, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On July 31, 2020, Kevin Hayes ("Appellant") requested from the Cabinet a copy of "all non-system databases/tables on the SQL Server …
Kevin Hayes — Kentucky Labor Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-204
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Marc Manley, Assistant Attorney General Summary: The Kentucky Labor Cabinet ("Cabinet") violated the Open Records Act ("the Act") when it did not issue a timely response to a request to inspect …
Thurman Wenzl — Kentucky Labor Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-048
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On December 7, 2020, The Courier-Journal ("Appellant") requested a copy of the Department's database showing "all people housed in state …
The Courier-Journal — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-046
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Samuel Harward, Jr. ("Appellant") asked to inspect certain unemployment records spanning a period time that ended in June of 2020. See …
Samuel Hayward, Jr. — Kentucky Labor Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-050
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On January 27, 2021, inmate Chris Hawkins ("Appellant") asked the Department to provide copies of all e-mails and other …
Chris Hawkins — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-182
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On July 30, 2021, Michael Grigsby ("Appellant") requested a copy of "the physical fitness standard that is required in the …
Michael Grigsby — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-003
Opinion Opinion By: Marc ManleyAssistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On November 8, 2021, Mary Talbott ("the Appellant") requested various records from the Cabinet related to her client's unemployment insurance claim. On November 16, …
Mary Talbott — Kentucky Labor Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-088
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Dawn Crawford ("Appellant") submitted a 31-part request dated February 5, 2022, for various records and information. The …
Dawn Crawford — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-016
23-ORD-016 January 30, 2023 In re: Kim Underwood/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it redacted pages of requested records without explaining how the …
Kim Underwood — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-262
23-ORD-262 October 2, 2023 In re: Antonio Dionte Williamson Trust/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that does …
Antonio Dionte Williamson Trust — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-270
23-ORD-270 October 10, 2023 In re: Eric Lloyd Hermansen/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that does not contain …
Eric Lloyd Hermansen — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-302
23-ORD-302 November 13, 2023 In re: Lewis Davenport/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open Records …
Lewis Davenport — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-348
23-ORD-348 December 28, 2023 In re: John Cheves/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it sought …
John Cheves — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-170
24-ORD-170 July 30, 2024 In re: Uriah Pasha/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (the “Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not issue a notice to the requester containing the contact …
Uriah Pasha — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-174
24-ORD-174 July 30, 2024 In re: Scott McDonnell/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for photos of a specific inmate that would …
Scott McDonnell — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-178
24-ORD-178 August 6, 2024 In re: Scott McDonnell/Department of Corrections Summary: The Office lacks jurisdiction to consider a complaint alleging that the Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) …
Scott McDonnell — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-007
25-ORD-007 January 7, 2025 In re: Vivian Miles/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it directed the Appellant to the public agency possessing the requested …
Vivian Miles — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-051
25-ORD-051 February 18, 2025 In re: Tim Arnold/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied two requests that did not precisely describe the …
Tim Arnold — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-049
25-ORD-049 February 18, 2025 In re: Alena Noakes/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied requests for records that, if released, could pose a …
Alena Noakes — Department of Corrections
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.