Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-227
24-ORD-227 October 21, 2024 In re: Dante Stone/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Open Records Act (“the Act”) does not apply to the Jefferson County Circuit Court Clerk (the “Clerk”). Open Records Decision On September 1, 2024, inmate Dante …
Dante Stone — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-237
24-ORD-237 November 12, 2024 In re: Alex Rib/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it required the Appellant to complete a commercial purpose form even though …
Alex Rib — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-256
24-ORD-256 December 3, 2024 In re: Jared Bennett/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (the “Department”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request …
Jared Bennett — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-258
24-ORD-258 December 5, 2024 In re: Eric Anthony/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records within …
Eric Anthony — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-014
25-ORD-014 January 14, 2025 In re: Stephen Kininmonth/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a copy of …
Stephen Kininmonth — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-013
25-ORD-013 January 14, 2025 In re: Kentucky Public Radio/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS …
Kentucky Public Radio — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-031
25-ORD-031 January 31, 2025 In re: Stephen Kininmonth/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Office cannot find that Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it claims to have provided all records …
Stephen Kininmonth — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-030
25-ORD-030 January 31, 2025 In re: Stephen Kininmonth/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that it does not possess. Metro also …
Stephen Kininmonth — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-032
25-ORD-032 February 3, 2025 In re: Ryan J. Dischinger/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a response within five business days of receiving …
Ryan J. Dischinger — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-064
25-ORD-064 March 17, 2025 In re: Eric Ribenboim/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records for failure to certify a commercial purpose …
Eric Ribenboim — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-088
25-ORD-088 March 31, 2025 In re: Kaylae Price/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided all records responsive to a request and the requester did not …
Kaylae Price — Louisville Metro Government
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-086
25-ORD-086 March 31, 2025 In re: Ryan J. Dischinger/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it did not respond to …
Ryan J. Dischinger — Louisville Metro Government
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.