Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-132
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 7, 2022, Marcus Green ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Department for the Department's "investigations for each …
Marcus Green — Louisville Metro Police Department
22-ORD-239
22-ORD-239 November 7, 2022 In re: Perry Probus/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records. The …
Perry Probus — Louisville Metro Police Department
23-ORD-055
23-ORD-055 March 13, 2023 In re: Micheal Whitehead/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect …
Micheal Whitehead — Louisville Metro Police Department
23-ORD-125
23-ORD-125 June 6, 2023 In re: Juanisha Jamison/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to explain why it redacted records and …
Juanisha Jamison — Louisville Metro Police Department
23-ORD-126
23-ORD-126 June 6, 2023 In re: Latonya Jamison/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to timely respond to an open records …
Latonya Jamison — Louisville Metro Police Department
23-ORD-164
23-ORD-164 July 10, 2023 In re: Sydney LaRue/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: This Office is unable to find that the Louisville Metro Police Department (the “Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is …
Sydney LaRue — Louisville Metro Police Department
23-ORD-167
23-ORD-167 July 11, 2023 In re: Nick Clark/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) by failing to issue timely responses to requests. The …
Nick Clark — Louisville Metro Police Department
23-ORD-227
23-ORD-227 August 25, 2023 In re: Shawntele Jackson/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Office is unable to find that the Louisville Metro Police Department (the “Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not …
Shawntele Jackson — Louisville Metro Police Department
23-ORD-260
23-ORD-260 October 2, 2023 In re: WAVE-TV/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld from inspection juvenile law …
WAVE-TV — Louisville Metro Police Department
23-ORD-291
23-ORD-291 November 1, 2023 In re: Kenny Goben/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Office cannot find that the Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot …
Kenny Goben — Louisville Metro Police Department
23-ORD-328
23-ORD-328 December 13, 2023 In re: Ryan Van Velzer/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), …
Ryan Van Velzer — Louisville Metro Police Department
24-ORD-041
24-ORD-041 February 20, 2024 In re: Gabrielle Lehrmann/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request to inspect records …
Gabrielle Lehrmann — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-131
24-ORD-131 May 31, 2024 In re: Jacob Ryan/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (the “Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it issued responses that failed to explain how the cited …
Jacob Ryan — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-137
24-ORD-137 June 12, 2024 In re: Makeda Charles/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records it does not …
Makeda Charles — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-256
24-ORD-256 December 3, 2024 In re: Jared Bennett/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (the “Department”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request …
Jared Bennett — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-258
24-ORD-258 December 5, 2024 In re: Eric Anthony/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records within …
Eric Anthony — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-014
25-ORD-014 January 14, 2025 In re: Stephen Kininmonth/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a copy of …
Stephen Kininmonth — Louisville Metro Police Department
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-013
25-ORD-013 January 14, 2025 In re: Kentucky Public Radio/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS …
Kentucky Public Radio — Louisville Metro Police Department
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.