Search AG Opinions & Decisions
22-ORD-206
22-ORD-206 October 7, 2022 In re: Dennis Bell/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not issue a timely response to a request to …
Dennis Bell — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-203
22-ORD-203 October 7, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that is …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-205
22-ORD-205 October 7, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-218
22-ORD-218 October 14, 2022 In re: Richard Goins/Transportation Cabinet Summary: The Transportation Cabinet (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to requests for public records. The Cabinet also violated …
Richard Goins — Transportation Cabinet
22-ORD-214
22-ORD-214 October 14, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records. …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-253
22-ORD-253 November 28, 2022 In re: Jennifer Morris/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide the subject of a …
Jennifer Morris — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-026
23-ORD-026 February 7, 2023 In re: Tyler Fryman/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when the email address of its records …
Tyler Fryman — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-039
23-ORD-039 February 20, 2023 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-057
23-ORD-057 March 15, 2023 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request to inspect in-person an …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
24-ORD-044
24-ORD-044 February 21, 2024 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for certified copies …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-115
24-ORD-115 May 8, 2024 In re: WDRB News/Transportation Cabinet Summary: The Transportation Cabinet (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to meet its burden to support redacting information from records relating to …
WDRB News — Transportation Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-132
24-ORD-132 May 31, 2024 In re: Cody Glenn/Transportation Cabinet Summary: The Transportation Cabinet (“the Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it could not provide records that do not exist. Open Records Decision On April …
Cody Glenn — Transportation Cabinet
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.