Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-109
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") requested copies of various records pertaining to the execution of a search …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-157
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On June 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Sheriff's Office to inspect all body camera footage related to …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-175
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On July 12, 2022, Phillip Hamm submitted a request to the Sheriff's Office for a copy of a list of all the open records requests that …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-178
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") requested copies of various records pertaining to the execution of a search …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-203
22-ORD-203 October 7, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that is …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-205
22-ORD-205 October 7, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-214
22-ORD-214 October 14, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records. …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-039
23-ORD-039 February 20, 2023 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-057
23-ORD-057 March 15, 2023 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request to inspect in-person an …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-113
23-ORD-113 May 23, 2023 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Shelby County Detention Center Summary: The Shelby County Detention Center (“the Center”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Shelby County Detention Center
23-ORD-202
23-ORD-202 August 7, 2023 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Spencer County Attorney’s Office Summary: The Spencer County Attorney’s Office (“the agency”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it could not provide records that are not within …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Spencer County Attorney’s Office
23-ORD-201
23-ORD-201 August 7, 2023 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Shelbyville Police Department Summary: In the face of competing factual claims, the Office cannot find that the Shelbyville Police Department (the “Department”) “required” the use of a specific form …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Shelbyville Police Department
23-ORD-271
23-ORD-271 October 10, 2023 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Jefferson County Property Valuation Administrator Summary: The Jefferson County Property Valuation Administrator (“the PVA”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request to …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Jefferson County Property Valuation Administrator
23-ORD-292
23-ORD-292 November 1, 2023 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Metro also violated …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-044
24-ORD-044 February 21, 2024 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for certified copies …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-095
24-ORD-095 April 11, 2024 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Louisville Regional Airport Authority Summary: The Louisville Regional Airport Authority (“the Authority”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Louisville Regional Airport Authority
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-108
24-ORD-108 April 30, 2024 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Jefferson County Commonwealth’s Attorney Summary: The Jefferson County Commonwealth’s Attorney (“the Commonwealth’s Attorney”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when she denied a request for …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Jefferson County Commonwealth’s Attorney
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-267
24-ORD-267 December 11, 2024 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/City of Stamping Ground Summary: The Office cannot find that the City of Stamping Ground (the “City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because it cannot resolve the factual dispute …
Saeid Shafizadeh — City of Stamping Ground
Open Records Decision —
25-ORD-109
25-ORD-109 April 30, 2025 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Shelbyville Police Department Summary: The Shelbyville Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to substantiate the fees imposed in its original …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Shelbyville Police Department
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.