Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-099
24-ORD-099 April 15, 2024 In re: Joel Peyton/Simpson County Judge/Executive Summary: The Simpson County Judge/Executive (“the Judge/Executive”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when he denied a request as unreasonably burdensome under KRS …
Joel Peyton — Simpson County Judge
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-098
24-ORD-098 April 15, 2024 In re: John Cheves/Department of Juvenile Justice Summary: This Office cannot find the Department of Juvenile Justice (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it claims to have provided all records …
John Cheves — Department of Juvenile Justice
Opinion —
OAG 24-03
April 16, 2024 OAG 24-03 Subject: A county judge/executive’s authority to appoint a deputy and assistants and establish their salaries, and a fiscal court clerk’s duty to publish notice of fiscal court meetings when certain conditions are met. …
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-101
24-ORD-101 April 17, 2024 In re: Jill Charles/Boone County Planning Commission Summary: The Boone County Planning Commission (“the Commission”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it could not provide records that do not exist. …
Jill Charles — Boone County Planning Commission
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-100
24-ORD-100 April 17, 2024 In re: Ben W. Richard, Jr./Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: Although the Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (the “Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not originally conduct an …
Ben W. Richard, Jr. — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Opinion —
OAG 24-04
April 18, 2024 OAG 24-04 Subject: The effective date of legislation passed during the 2024 Regular Session of the Kentucky General Assembly. Requested by: Cyndi Galvin, Reviser of Statutes Legislative Research Commission Written by: James M. …
Opinion —
OAG 24-05
April 26, 2024 OAG 24-05 Subjects: Whether home incarcerees may be arrested and charged with escape for violating a condition of their home incarceration. Requested by: Jimmy Cantrell, Executive Director Ohio County ARCH Program Written by: Jeremy …
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-104
24-ORD-104 April 26, 2024 In re: Jacob Garmon/Office of the Attorney General Summary: The Office of the Attorney General (“the Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it notified a requester that it was not the custodian of …
Jacob Garmon — Office of the Attorney General
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-103
24-ORD-103 April 26, 2024 In re: Timothy Day/Kentucky Parole Board Summary: The Kentucky Parole Board (“the Board”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide a record that does not exist. Open Records Decision Inmate …
Timothy Day — Kentucky Parole Board
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-107
24-ORD-107 April 26, 2024 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld from inspection under KRS 17.150(2) intelligence and investigative reports …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-106
24-ORD-106 April 26, 2024 In re: Glen Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot resolve the factual …
Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-105
24-ORD-105 April 26, 2024 In re: Jeremy Henley/Rowan County Detention Center Summary: The Office cannot find that the Rowan County Detention Center (“the Detention Center”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is unable to …
Jeremy Henley — Rowan County Detention Center
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-102
24-ORD-102 April 26, 2024 In re: Jerry Winstead/Kentucky State Reformatory Summary: The Kentucky State Reformatory (“the Reformatory”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that are exempt from disclosure …
Jerry Winstead — Kentucky State Reformatory
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-109
24-ORD-109 April 30, 2024 In re: Caleb Ballard/Christian County Public Schools Summary: Christian County Public Schools (“CCPS”) subverted the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it originally imposed a fee for copies of electronic records beyond the …
Caleb Ballard — Christian County Public Schools
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-108
24-ORD-108 April 30, 2024 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Jefferson County Commonwealth’s Attorney Summary: The Jefferson County Commonwealth’s Attorney (“the Commonwealth’s Attorney”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when she denied a request for …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Jefferson County Commonwealth’s Attorney
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-112
24-ORD-112 May 1, 2024 In re: Stephen Bratcher/Department of Juvenile Justice Summary: The Department of Juvenile Justice (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it conducted an adequate search for records, provided …
Stephen Bratcher — Department of Juvenile Justice
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-111
24-ORD-111 May 1, 2024 In re: Scott Romano/Scott County Attorney’s Office Summary: The Scott County Attorney’s Office (“the agency”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records without explaining how the cited …
Scott Romano — Scott County Attorney’s Office
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-110
24-ORD-110 May 1, 2024 In re: James Barnett/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do not …
James Barnett — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Open Meetings Decision —
24-OMD-114
24-OMD-114 May 3, 2024 In re: Chad Frizzell/City of Clinton Summary: The City of Clifton (“the City”) violated the Open Meetings Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a written response to a complaint within three business days. Open Meetings …
Chad Frizzell — City of Clinton
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-113
24-ORD-113 May 3, 2024 In re: Makayla Triplett/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld from inspection under KRS 61.878(1)(a) and KRS 17.150(4) intelligence …
Makayla Triplett — Kentucky State Police
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.