Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-124
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On July 8, 2020, Joshua Powell ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Department to inspect records in-person at the Department. …
Joshua Powell — Lexington Police Department
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-125
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Michelle D. Harrison,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Kris Carlson ("Appellant") requested from the Department an opportunity "to inspect or obtain copies of public records" …
Kris Carlson — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-157
Opinion Opinion By: James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General In re: Michael Mobley/Department of Corrections Summary : The Department of Corrections, Division of Probation and Parole ("Division"), did not violate the Open Records Act ("the Act") …
Michael Mobley — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-181
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision John Shockley ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Department to obtain a copy of a settlement agreement, including the settlement …
John Shockley — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-203
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Marc Manley, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On November 13, 2020, Levi Henson ("Appellant") requested from the Department a copy of all public records that document …
Levi Henson — Lexington Police Department
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-048
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On December 7, 2020, The Courier-Journal ("Appellant") requested a copy of the Department's database showing "all people housed in state …
The Courier-Journal — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-050
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On January 27, 2021, inmate Chris Hawkins ("Appellant") asked the Department to provide copies of all e-mails and other …
Chris Hawkins — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-118
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General; Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Joshua Powell ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Department for "CAD entries, calls for service by and any other 'Code 17's'" …
Joshua Powell — Lexington Police Department
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-145
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Summary : The Lexington Police Department (the "Department") did not violate the Open Records Act ("the Act") when it denied a request for "documents …
Kate Holm — Lexington Police Department
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-182
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On July 30, 2021, Michael Grigsby ("Appellant") requested a copy of "the physical fitness standard that is required in the …
Michael Grigsby — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-262
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Marc Manley, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision K.T. 1("the Appellant") submitted a request to the Department in which she sought all body-worn camera video ("video") depicting an …
K.T. — Lexington Police Department
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-088
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Dawn Crawford ("Appellant") submitted a 31-part request dated February 5, 2022, for various records and information. The …
Dawn Crawford — Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-072
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Marc Manley, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Jonathan Fannin ("the Appellant") submitted a request to the Department to inspect all body-worn camera footage taken during the …
Jonathan Fannin — Lexington Police Department
22-ORD-281
22-ORD-281 December 22, 2022 In re: Tyler Fryman/Lexington Police Department Summary: The Lexington Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to display the email address of its records custodian …
Tyler Fryman — Lexington Police Department
23-ORD-016
23-ORD-016 January 30, 2023 In re: Kim Underwood/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it redacted pages of requested records without explaining how the …
Kim Underwood — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-018
23-ORD-018 January 31, 2023 In re: Joshua Powell/Lexington Police Department Summary: The Lexington Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when its initial response to a request failed to explain how KRS …
Joshua Powell — Lexington Police Department
23-ORD-025
23-ORD-025 February 2, 2023 In re: Joshua Powell/Lexington Police Department Summary: The Lexington Police Department (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of a video recording of a field …
Joshua Powell — Lexington Police Department
23-ORD-238
23-ORD-238 September 12, 2023 In re: Vivian Miles/Lexington Police Department Summary: The Lexington Police Department (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records it does not possess. Open …
Vivian Miles — Lexington Police Department
23-ORD-262
23-ORD-262 October 2, 2023 In re: Antonio Dionte Williamson Trust/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that does …
Antonio Dionte Williamson Trust — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-270
23-ORD-270 October 10, 2023 In re: Eric Lloyd Hermansen/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that does not contain …
Eric Lloyd Hermansen — Department of Corrections
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.