Search AG Opinions & Decisions
19-ORD-230
19-ORD-230 December 19, 2019 In re: Katherine Brown/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“MCSO”) committed a procedural violation of the Open Records Act (“the Act”) by failing to respond to an open …
Katherine Brown — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-084
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On April 14, 2020, inmate Donald R. Phillips ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Office for a copy of an executive order from …
Donald R. Phillips — Office of the Attorney General
Open Records Decision —
20-ORD-090
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On March 16, 2020, Shannon James ("Appellant") made a request of this Office for copies of investigation records pertaining to the …
Shannon James — Office of the Attorney General
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-193
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On August 10, 2021, Daniel Zulawski ("Appellant"), an inmate of the Federal Medical Center, Devens, in Massachusetts, requested …
Daniel Zulawski — Office of the Attorney General
Open Records Decision —
21-ORD-248
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On October 1, 2021, Harry Crouch ("Appellant") requested copies of all communications between any employee or agent of the …
Harry Crouch — Office of the Attorney General
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-109
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") requested copies of various records pertaining to the execution of a search …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-145
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On May 17, 2022, Dennis Bell ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Sheriff's Office to inspect various records related to the …
Dennis Bell — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-157
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On June 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Sheriff's Office to inspect all body camera footage related to …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-175
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On July 12, 2022, Phillip Hamm submitted a request to the Sheriff's Office for a copy of a list of all the open records requests that …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-178
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; James M. Herrick, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On February 22, 2022, Phillip Hamm ("Appellant") requested copies of various records pertaining to the execution of a search …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-186
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Iris Skidmore ("the Appellant") submitted a request to the Office asking for copies of records related to the Office's legal …
Iris Skidmore — Office of the Attorney General
22-ORD-206
22-ORD-206 October 7, 2022 In re: Dennis Bell/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not issue a timely response to a request to …
Dennis Bell — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-203
22-ORD-203 October 7, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that is …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-205
22-ORD-205 October 7, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-214
22-ORD-214 October 14, 2022 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request for records. …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
22-ORD-253
22-ORD-253 November 28, 2022 In re: Jennifer Morris/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide the subject of a …
Jennifer Morris — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-026
23-ORD-026 February 7, 2023 In re: Tyler Fryman/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when the email address of its records …
Tyler Fryman — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-039
23-ORD-039 February 20, 2023 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (the “Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-057
23-ORD-057 March 15, 2023 In re: Phillip Hamm/McCracken County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The McCracken County Sheriff’s Office (“Sheriff’s Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request to inspect in-person an …
Phillip Hamm — McCracken County Sheriff’s Office
23-ORD-142
23-ORD-142 June 22, 2023 In re: John Beam/Office of the Attorney General Summary: The Office of the Attorney General (“the Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it could not provide records that are not within its custody or …
John Beam — Office of the Attorney General
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.