Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-134
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On May 7, 2022, Lawrence Trageser ("Appellant") submitted a request to the District for the shift assignment and work schedules for a …
Lawrence Trageser — Jeffersontown Fire Protection District
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-133
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Matthew Ray, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On May 7, 2022, Lawrence Trageser ("Appellant") submitted a request to the District for "[t]he termination letter, resignation letter …
Lawrence Trageser — Jeffersontown Fire Protection District
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-150
Opinion Opinion By: James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On June 3, 2022, Lawrence Trageser ("Appellant") requested the personnel file of a City police officer and certain records supplied by the officer at the time he …
Lawrence Trageser — City of Pioneer Village
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-149
Opinion Opinion By: Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Lawrence Trageser ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Sheriff's Office for two categories of records related to a specific employee. The Appellant asked that the …
Lawrence Trageser — Bullitt County Sheriff’s Office
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-165
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron, Attorney General; Marc Manley, Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On June 12, 2022, Lawrence Trageser ("Appellant") attempted to initiate an appeal to this Office and claimed that the District had …
Lawrence Trageser — Jeffersontown Fire Protection District
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-166
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision On April 18, 2022, Lawrence Trageser ("Appellant") requested electronic copies, "in a PDF or similar format," of certain records …
Lawrence Trageser — Jeffersontown Fire Protection District
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-173
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Matthew Ray,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Lawrence Trageser ("Appellant") submitted a request to the Clerk for all emails she had sent or received between January 1, 2020, and …
Lawrence Trageser — Shelby County Clerk
Open Records Decision —
22-ORD-174
Opinion Opinion By: Daniel Cameron,Attorney General;Marc Manley,Assistant Attorney General Open Records Decision Lawrence Trageser ("Appellant") submitted to the Board a request to inspect a report created by the Board's legal counsel following an …
Lawrence Trageser — Spencer County Board of Education
22-ORD-224
22-ORD-224 October 20, 2022 In re: Carlos Harris/Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (the “Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond fully to a request within …
Carlos Harris — Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
22-ORD-242
22-ORD-242 November 7, 2022 In re: Carlos Harris/Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Office is unable to find that the Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (the “Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to …
Carlos Harris — Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
22-ORD-283
22-ORD-283 December 29, 2022 In re: Carlos Harris/Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (the “Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do …
Carlos Harris — Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
23-ORD-005
23-ORD-005 January 13, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Jeffersontown Fire Protection District Summary: This Office cannot find that the Jeffersontown Fire Protection District (the “District”) failed to issue a timely response to a request to inspect …
Lawrence Trageser — Jeffersontown Fire Protection District
23-ORD-007
23-ORD-007 January 18, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/ Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision …
Lawrence Trageser — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-032
23-ORD-032 February 13, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Jeffersontown Fire Protection District Summary: The Jeffersontown Fire Protection District (“the District”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide a record that …
Lawrence Trageser — Jeffersontown Fire Protection District
23-ORD-036
23-ORD-036 February 16, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: This Office cannot find that the Kentucky Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because this Office is …
Lawrence Trageser — Kentucky Department of Corrections
23-ORD-050
23-ORD-050 March 7, 2023 In re: Carlos Harris/Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: This Office cannot find that the Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided what the …
Carlos Harris — Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
23-ORD-063
23-ORD-063 March 21, 2023 In re: Carlos Harris/Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: Because the requester has made a prima facie case that public records should exist, the Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (“Complex”) violated the Open …
Carlos Harris — Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
23-ORD-072
23-ORD-072 March 28, 2023 In re: Carlos Harris/St. Claire Regional Medical Center Summary: In the absence of evidence that the St. Claire Regional Medical Center (the “Medical Center”) receives at least 25% of its funds expended in Kentucky from …
Carlos Harris — St. Claire Regional Medical Center
23-ORD-076
23-ORD-076 March 30, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Louisville Metro Animal Services Summary: Louisville Metro Animal Services (“the agency”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied an imprecise request for records because it …
Lawrence Trageser — Louisville Metro Animal Services
23-ORD-086
23-ORD-086 April 13, 2023 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Spencer County Sheriff’s Office Summary: The Spencer County Sheriff’s Office (“the Sheriff’s Office”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to advise a requester that requested …
Lawrence Trageser — Spencer County Sheriff’s Office
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.