Search AG Opinions & Decisions
24-ORD-008
24-OR-008 January 17, 2024 In re: Jessica Thornton/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of a privileged memorandum from its attorney to …
Jessica Thornton — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-009
24-ORD-009 January 17, 2024 In re: Uriah Pasha/Kentucky Parole Board Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky Parole Board (“the Board”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records it …
Uriah Pasha — Kentucky Parole Board
24-ORD-012
24-ORD-012 January 17, 2024 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Open Records Decision On …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-OMD-007
24-OMD-007 January 17, 2024 In re: Josh Hicks/Anderson County Board of Education Summary: The Anderson County Board of Education (“the Board”) violated the Open Meetings Act (“the Act”) when it entered closed session without a motion and vote and …
Josh Hicks — Anderson County Board of Education
24-ORD-010
24-ORD-010 January 17, 2024 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown Summary: Under 40 KAR 1:030 § 4, the Attorney General may not reconsider a decision rendered under the Open Records Act (“the Act”). The Office will not reconsider 23-ORD-301, in which …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown
24-ORD-011
24-ORD-011 January 17, 2024 In re: Michael Conkright/Marshall Circuit Court Clerk Summary: The Open Records Act (“the Act”) does not apply to records of the Marshall Circuit Court Clerk (“the Clerk”). Open Records Decision On December 4, 2023, …
Michael Conkright — Marshall Circuit Court Clerk
24-ORD-018
24-ORD-018 January 22, 2024 In re: Michael R. Carter/Board of Cosmetology Summary: The Board of Cosmetology (“Board”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open Records Decision Michael …
Michael R. Carter — Board of Cosmetology
24-ORD-014
24-ORD-014 January 22, 2024 In re: Meldrum G. Harvey/Green River Correctional Complex Summary: The Green River Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that does not …
Meldrum G. Harvey — Green River Correctional Complex
24-ORD-017
24-ORD-017 January 22, 2024 In re: Michael R. Carter/Board of Cosmetology Summary: The Board of Cosmetology (“Board”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open Records Decision Michael …
Michael R. Carter — Board of Cosmetology
24-ORD-016
24-ORD-016 January 22, 2024 In re: Mike Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld an email that was exempt from disclosure under KRS …
Mike Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-015
24-ORD-015 January 22, 2024 In re: Evan Doyle/Louisville Metro Government Summary: Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”) within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it delayed access to records …
Evan Doyle — Louisville Metro Government
24-ORD-019
24-ORD-019 January 25, 2024 In re: Vivian Miles/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a timely response and failed to respond to a portion of a request. …
Vivian Miles — Kentucky State Police
24-ORD-022
24-ORD-022 January 25, 2024 In re: Kevin Zipperle/University of Louisville Athletics Association Summary: The University of Louisville Athletics Association (“the Association”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it could not …
Kevin Zipperle — University of Louisville Athletics Association
24-ORD-020
24-ORD-020 January 25, 2024 In re: Laura O’Brien/Boone County School District Summary: The Boone County School District (“the District”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to notify the requester whether it was complying within …
Laura O’Brien — Boone County School District
24-ORD-021
24-ORD-021 January 25, 2024 In re: Lawrence Trageser/Okolona Fire Protection District Summary: The Okolona Fire Protection District (“the District”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied requests for public records because …
Lawrence Trageser — Okolona Fire Protection District
24-ORD-023
24-ORD-023 January 29, 2024 In re: David Bricarello/Franklin County Fiscal Court Summary: The Office cannot find that the Franklin County Fiscal Court (“the Fiscal Court”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it claims to have provided all …
David Bricarello — Franklin County Fiscal Court
24-ORD-025
24-ORD-025 January 29, 2024 In re: Uriah Pasha/Western Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Office cannot find that the Western Kentucky Correctional Complex (“Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide …
Uriah Pasha — Western Kentucky Correctional Complex
24-ORD-024
24-ORD-024 January 29, 2024 In re: Kentucky Innocence Project/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request to provide information, or when it did not …
Kentucky Innocence Project — Kentucky State Police
24-OMD-026
24-OMD-026 February 6, 2024 In re: Douglas Phelps/City of London Summary: Because the Open Meetings Act (“the Act”) does not entitle any member of the public to be heard at a public meeting, the City of London (“the City”) did not violate the Act …
Douglas Phelps — City of London
24-ORD-029
24-ORD-029 February 6, 2024 In re: Linzey Lewis/Morgan County Fiscal Court Summary: The Morgan County Fiscal Court (“the Fiscal Court”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of purchase order notebooks that were …
Linzey Lewis — Morgan County Fiscal Court
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.