Search AG Opinions & Decisions
23-ORD-302
23-ORD-302 November 13, 2023 In re: Lewis Davenport/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open Records …
Lewis Davenport — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-303
23-ORD-303 November 13, 2023 In re: Jan D. Blythe/Franklin County Regional Jail Summary: The Office cannot find that the Franklin County Regional Jail (“the Jail”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot resolve the …
Jan D. Blythe — Franklin County Regional Jail
23-ORD-306
23-ORD-306 November 14, 2023 In re: John Yarbrough/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide a copy of an audio recording in its original format and failed to …
John Yarbrough — Kentucky State Police
23-ORD-305
23-ORD-305 November 14, 2023 In re: Eric Cook/Ashland Police Department Summary: The Ashland Police Department (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for a record that does not exist. Open …
Eric Cook — Ashland Police Department
23-ORD-307
23-ORD-307 November 14, 2023 In re: Stanley W. Roberts/Laurel County Detention Center Summary: The Laurel County Detention Center (“the Center”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open …
Stanley W. Roberts — Laurel County Detention Center
23-ORD-304
23-ORD-304 November 14, 2023 In re: Eric Cook/City of Ashland Summary: The City of Ashland (“the City”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it asked its employees to search their emails for responsive records. Open Records Decision …
Eric Cook — City of Ashland
23-ORD-308
23-ORD-308 November 14, 2023 In re: Anthony Sadler/Lee Adjustment Center Summary: The Lee Adjustment Center (“the Center”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records it does not possess. Open Records …
Anthony Sadler — Lee Adjustment Center
23-ORD-309
23-ORD-309 November 14, 2023 In re: Vivian Miles/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. KSP also did not violate the Act …
Vivian Miles — Kentucky State Police
23-ORD-311
23-ORD-311 November 20, 2023 In re: Richard Jones/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”), within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), by delaying access to requested records …
Richard Jones — Kentucky State Police
23-ORD-310
23-ORD-310 November 20, 2023 In re: Troy Buckler/Southeast State Correctional Complex Summary: The Southeast State Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request to inspect records without …
Troy Buckler — Southeast State Correctional Complex
23-ORD-312
23-ORD-312 November 20, 2023 In re: Thomas Elza/Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied an inmate’s request for a copy …
Thomas Elza — Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
Opinion —
OAG 23-08
Commonwealth of Kentucky Office of the Attorney General Daniel Cameron Attorney General Capitol Building, Suite 118 700 Capital Avenue Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 (502) 696-5300 Fax: (502) 564-2894 November 27, 2023 OAG 23-08 Subject: Whether KRS …
23-ORD-313
23-ORD-313 November 27, 2023 In re: Ben J. Wyatt/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) subverted the intent of the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it invoked KRS 61.872(5) but did not explain why it was necessary to …
Ben J. Wyatt — Kentucky State Police
23-ORD-314
23-ORD-314 November 27, 2023 In re: Nick Horne/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of public records that are exempt under KRS 61.878(1)(h) and …
Nick Horne — Kentucky State Police
23-ORD-316
23-ORD-316 December 4, 2023 In re: Carlos Harris/Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (“Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not explain that a portion of the Appellant’s …
Carlos Harris — Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
23-ORD-317
23-ORD-317 December 4, 2023 In re: Lindzey Lewis/Morgan County Fiscal Court Summary: The Morgan County Fiscal Court (“Fiscal Court”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it redacted portions of records without citing any exception …
Lindzey Lewis — Morgan County Fiscal Court
23-ORD-319
23-ORD-319 December 5, 2023 In re: Glenn D. Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because it cannot resolve the factual …
Glenn D. Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-318
23-ORD-318 December 5, 2023 In re: Glenn D. Odom/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Office cannot find that the Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond …
Glenn D. Odom — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
23-ORD-320
23-ORD-320 December 5, 2023 In re: Courtney Graham/Kentucky Board of Cosmetology Summary: The Kentucky Board of Cosmetology (“the Board”) failed to give a detailed explanation of the cause for delay when it cited KRS 61.872(5) in responding to a …
Courtney Graham — Kentucky Board of Cosmetology
23-ORD-321
23-ORD-321 December 5, 2023 In re: Vivian Miles/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (the “Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not issue a timely response to a request …
Vivian Miles — Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.