Search AG Opinions & Decisions
23-ORD-285
23-ORD-285 October 24, 2023 In re: Kurt Wallace/Metcalfe County Clerk Summary: The Metcalfe County Clerk (“the Clerk”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when she responded timely to a request to inspect records and charged a copying …
Kurt Wallace — Metcalfe County Clerk
23-ORD-282
23-ORD-282 October 24, 2023 In re: Leslie Lawson/Whitley County Detention Center Summary: The Whitley County Detention Center (“the Jail”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist. Open …
Leslie Lawson — Whitley County Detention Center
23-ORD-281
23-ORD-281 October 24, 2023 In re: Bradley Morris/Mayfield Police Department Summary: The Office cannot find that the Mayfield Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot resolve the …
Bradley Morris — Mayfield Police Department
23-ORD-283
23-ORD-283 October 24, 2023 In re: Leslie Lawson/Corbin Police Department Summary: The Office cannot find that the Corbin Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect …
Leslie Lawson — Corbin Police Department
23-ORD-284
23-ORD-284 October 24, 2023 In re: Carlos Harris/Kenton County Commonwealth’s Attorney Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kenton County Commonwealth’s Attorney (“Commonwealth’s Attorney”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when he did …
Carlos Harris — Kenton County Commonwealth’s Attorney
23-ORD-287
23-ORD-287 October 25, 2023 In re: Bobby Inman/Roederer Correctional Complex Summary: The Roederer Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a timely response to a request. The Complex did …
Bobby Inman — Roederer Correctional Complex
23-ORD-288
23-ORD-288 October 25, 2023 In re: James A. Campbell/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied an inmate’s request for a …
James A. Campbell — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
23-ORD-289
23-ORD-289 October 30, 2023 In re: Cortrenaye Chandler/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot resolve the factual dispute …
Cortrenaye Chandler — Kentucky State Police
23-ORD-290
23-ORD-290 October 31, 2023 In re: Leslie Haun/Western Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Western Kentucky Correctional Complex (the “Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not deliver the requested records to …
Leslie Haun — Western Kentucky Correctional Complex
23-ORD-293
23-ORD-293 November 1, 2023 In re: Joseph Mayo/City of Newport Summary: The City of Newport (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a final written response to a request for records within five business days. …
Joseph Mayo — City of Newport
23-ORD-291
23-ORD-291 November 1, 2023 In re: Kenny Goben/Louisville Metro Police Department Summary: The Office cannot find that the Louisville Metro Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot …
Kenny Goben — Louisville Metro Police Department
23-ORD-292
23-ORD-292 November 1, 2023 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Louisville Metro Government Summary: The Louisville Metro Government (“Metro”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not respond to a request to inspect records. Metro also violated …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Louisville Metro Government
23-ORD-295
22-ORD-295 November 3, 2023 In re: Kim Whitley/Kentucky Department of Insurance Summary: The Kentucky Department of Insurance’s (“the Department”) initial response to a request to inspect records violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because it …
Kim Whitley — Kentucky Department of Insurance Summary: The Kentucky Department of Insurance’s
23-ORD-294
23-ORD-294 November 3, 2023 In re: John Yarbrough/Justice and Public Safety Cabinet Summary: The Justice and Public Safety Cabinet (“the Cabinet”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied requests for records that it does not …
John Yarbrough — Justice and Public Safety Cabinet
23-ORD-300
23-ORD-300 November 6, 2023 In re: Tatiana Rose/Bluegrass Area Development District Summary: The Bluegrass Area Development District (“the District”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond to a request to inspect records …
Tatiana Rose — Bluegrass Area Development District
23-ORD-299
23-ORD-299 November 6, 2023 In re: Jerald Overton/Bell County Forestry Camp Summary: The Bell County Forestry Camp (“the Camp”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for JPay emails exchanged between private …
Jerald Overton — Bell County Forestry Camp
23-ORD-297
23-ORD-297 November 6, 2023 In re: James Harrison/Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it initially denied a request to inspect …
James Harrison — Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
23-ORD-301
23-ORD-301 November 6, 2023 In re: Dan Holman/City of Georgetown Summary: The City of Georgetown (“the City”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of notes under KRS 61.878(1)(i). Open Records Decision On …
Dan Holman — City of Georgetown
23-ORD-298
23-ORD-298 November 6, 2023 In re: Genevia Risner/City of Maysville Summary: The City of Maysville (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it conducted an inadequate search for records. However, the Office cannot find that the …
Genevia Risner — City of Maysville
23-ORD-296
23-ORD-296 November 6, 2023 In re: Peter Cummins/Daviess County Fiscal Court Summary: The Daviess County Fiscal Court (the “Fiscal Court”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request to inspect records without explaining how …
Peter Cummins — Daviess County Fiscal Court
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.