Search AG Opinions & Decisions
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-104
24-ORD-104 April 26, 2024 In re: Jacob Garmon/Office of the Attorney General Summary: The Office of the Attorney General (“the Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it notified a requester that it was not the custodian of …
Jacob Garmon — Office of the Attorney General
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-103
24-ORD-103 April 26, 2024 In re: Timothy Day/Kentucky Parole Board Summary: The Kentucky Parole Board (“the Board”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide a record that does not exist. Open Records Decision Inmate …
Timothy Day — Kentucky Parole Board
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-107
24-ORD-107 April 26, 2024 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld from inspection under KRS 17.150(2) intelligence and investigative reports …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-106
24-ORD-106 April 26, 2024 In re: Glen Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky State Penitentiary (the “Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot resolve the factual …
Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-105
24-ORD-105 April 26, 2024 In re: Jeremy Henley/Rowan County Detention Center Summary: The Office cannot find that the Rowan County Detention Center (“the Detention Center”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office is unable to …
Jeremy Henley — Rowan County Detention Center
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-102
24-ORD-102 April 26, 2024 In re: Jerry Winstead/Kentucky State Reformatory Summary: The Kentucky State Reformatory (“the Reformatory”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that are exempt from disclosure …
Jerry Winstead — Kentucky State Reformatory
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-109
24-ORD-109 April 30, 2024 In re: Caleb Ballard/Christian County Public Schools Summary: Christian County Public Schools (“CCPS”) subverted the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it originally imposed a fee for copies of electronic records beyond the …
Caleb Ballard — Christian County Public Schools
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-108
24-ORD-108 April 30, 2024 In re: Saeid Shafizadeh/Jefferson County Commonwealth’s Attorney Summary: The Jefferson County Commonwealth’s Attorney (“the Commonwealth’s Attorney”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when she denied a request for …
Saeid Shafizadeh — Jefferson County Commonwealth’s Attorney
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-112
24-ORD-112 May 1, 2024 In re: Stephen Bratcher/Department of Juvenile Justice Summary: The Department of Juvenile Justice (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it conducted an adequate search for records, provided …
Stephen Bratcher — Department of Juvenile Justice
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-111
24-ORD-111 May 1, 2024 In re: Scott Romano/Scott County Attorney’s Office Summary: The Scott County Attorney’s Office (“the agency”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records without explaining how the cited …
Scott Romano — Scott County Attorney’s Office
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-110
24-ORD-110 May 1, 2024 In re: James Barnett/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records that do not …
James Barnett — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Open Meetings Decision —
24-OMD-114
24-OMD-114 May 3, 2024 In re: Chad Frizzell/City of Clinton Summary: The City of Clifton (“the City”) violated the Open Meetings Act (“the Act”) when it failed to issue a written response to a complaint within three business days. Open Meetings …
Chad Frizzell — City of Clinton
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-113
24-ORD-113 May 3, 2024 In re: Makayla Triplett/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld from inspection under KRS 61.878(1)(a) and KRS 17.150(4) intelligence …
Makayla Triplett — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-115
24-ORD-115 May 8, 2024 In re: WDRB News/Transportation Cabinet Summary: The Transportation Cabinet (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to meet its burden to support redacting information from records relating to …
WDRB News — Transportation Cabinet
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-116
24-ORD-116 May 9, 2024 In re: Michael P. Moore/Kentucky State Police Summary: The Kentucky State Police (“KSP”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”), when it redacted or withheld information which is exempted from disclosure under KRS …
Michael P. Moore — Kentucky State Police
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-117
24-ORD-117 May 9, 2024 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky Department of Corrections Summary: The Office cannot find that the Kentucky Department of Corrections (the “Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because the Office cannot resolve …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky Department of Corrections
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-119
24-ORD-119 May 10, 2024 In re: Lexington Herald–Leader/City of Richmond Summary: The City of Richmond (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records without explaining how the attorney-client privilege …
Lexington Herald–Leader — City of Richmond
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-118
24-ORD-118 May 10, 2024 In re: Brenda Rosen/University of Kentucky Summary: The University of Kentucky (“the University”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request to inspect text messages on privately-owned devices …
Brenda Rosen — University of Kentucky
96-ORD-024
96-ORD-24 does not exist. That number was not assigned. … 96-ORD-024 …
96-ORD-024 does not exist. That number was not assigned.
Open Records Decision —
24-ORD-120
24-ORD-120 May 13, 2024 In re: Todd Conley/Paintsville Lake State Park Summary: The Paintsville Lake State Park (the “Park”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it issued a response to a request within five business days of …
Todd Conley — Paintsville Lake State Park
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.