Search AG Opinions & Decisions
23-ORD-009
23-ORD-009 January 20, 2023 In re: Adam Lye/Oldham County School District Summary: The Oldham County School District (the “District”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied a request for records related to an ongoing …
Adam Lye — Oldham County School District
23-ORD-008
23-ORD-008 January 20, 2023 In re: Leonel Martinez/City of Owensboro Summary: Under 40 KAR 1:030 § 4, the Attorney General shall not reconsider a prior decision rendered under the Open Records Act (“the Act”). This Office will not reconsider …
Leonel Martinez — City of Owensboro
23-ORD-010
23-ORD-010 January 23, 2023 In re: Sean Southard/Office of the Governor Summary: The Office of the Governor (“the agency”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it redacted communications that were purely personal under KRS …
Sean Southard — Office of the Governor
23-ORD-013
23-ORD-013 January 26, 2023 In re: Lisa Gannoe/Eastern Kentucky University Summary: Eastern Kentucky University (“the University”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it delayed access to public records on the basis that its employees, as …
Lisa Gannoe — Eastern Kentucky University
23-ORD-014
23-ORD-014 January 26, 2023 In re: David Pennington/Strategic Security Corporation Summary: This Office cannot find that the Strategic Security Corporation (the “Corporation”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) because it is not a public …
David Pennington — Strategic Security Corporation
23-ORD-012
23-ORD-012 January 26, 2023 In re: James Harrison/Administrative Office of the Courts Summary: The Open Records Act (“the Act”) does not apply to records of the Administrative Office of the Courts (“AOC”). Open Records Decision On March 27, 2022, …
James Harrison — Administrative Office of the Courts
23-ORD-011
23-ORD-011 January 26, 2023 In re: Crystal Young/Clark County Public School District Summary: The Clark County Public School District (“the District”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it could not provide access to records that …
Crystal Young — Clark County Public School District
23-ORD-016
23-ORD-016 January 30, 2023 In re: Kim Underwood/Department of Corrections Summary: The Department of Corrections (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it redacted pages of requested records without explaining how the …
Kim Underwood — Department of Corrections
23-ORD-015
23-ORD-015 January 30, 2023 In re: Melissa Thornsberry/Office of Attorney General Summary: The Office of Attorney General (“the Office”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when its response to a request to inspect records complied with …
Melissa Thornsberry — Office of Attorney General
23-ORD-022
23-ORD-022 January 31, 2023 In re: Joshua Orr/Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex Summary: The Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to cite an applicable exemption and …
Joshua Orr — Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex
23-ORD-021
23-ORD-021 January 31, 2023 In re: Jeff Carpenter/Luther Luckett Correctional Complex Summary: The Luther Luckett Correctional Complex (“the Complex”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it did not provide records that do not exist …
Jeff Carpenter — Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
23-ORD-020
23-ORD-020 January 31, 2023 In re: Melanie Barker/Cabinet for Health and Family Services Summary: The Cabinet for Health and Family Services (“the Cabinet”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) within the meaning of KRS 61.880(4), when it did …
Melanie Barker — Cabinet for Health and Family Service
23-ORD-019
23-ORD-019 January 31, 2023 In re: Jeremy Bryant/City of London Summary: The City of London (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to respond timely to a request for records. Open Records Decision On December 19, 2022, …
Jeremy Bryant — City of London
23-ORD-018
23-ORD-018 January 31, 2023 In re: Joshua Powell/Lexington Police Department Summary: The Lexington Police Department (“the Department”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when its initial response to a request failed to explain how KRS …
Joshua Powell — Lexington Police Department
23-OMD-017
23-OMD-017 January 31, 2023 In re: Victoria Poma/City of Williamsburg Board of Adjustments Summary: The City of Williamsburg Board of Adjustments (“the Board”) violated the Open Meetings Act (“the Act”) at a special meeting conducted on November 15, …
Victoria Poma — City of Williamsburg Board of Adjustments
23-ORD-023
23-ORD-023 January 31, 2023 In re: Bethany Baxter/City of Irvine Summary: The City of Irvine (“the City”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it partially denied the Appellant’s first request for records without citing the specific …
Bethany Baxter — City of Irvine
23-ORD-024
23-ORD-024 February 2, 2023 In re: Perry Boxx/Murray State University Summary: Murray State University (“the University”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it withheld an email containing a statement describing past events because none …
Perry Boxx — Murray State University
23-ORD-025
23-ORD-025 February 2, 2023 In re: Joshua Powell/Lexington Police Department Summary: The Lexington Police Department (“the Department”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it denied inspection of a video recording of a field …
Joshua Powell — Lexington Police Department
23-ORD-027
23-ORD-027 February 7, 2023 In re: Glenn Odom/Kentucky State Penitentiary Summary: This Office cannot find the Kentucky State Penitentiary (“the Penitentiary”) violated the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it provided what the requester considers …
Glenn Odom — Kentucky State Penitentiary
23-ORD-028
23-ORD-028 February 7, 2023 In re: Uriah Pasha/Kentucky Parole Board Summary: The Kentucky Parole Board (“the Board”) did not violate the Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it explained why it could not provide a copy of a record that no longer …
Uriah Pasha — Kentucky Parole Board
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.